My dude, people might commit crimes while having opinions that you support. If your only way to deal with it is populist rhetorics against a vague (ofc overarchingly powerful :| ) enemy, then you fit right in with the populist right wing crowd.
The official Monero website has some good recommendations. There’s always the option of using cash (etc.) to buy Monero from one of the decentralized exchanges, but you may have to interact irl.
Translation of parts from the German netzpolitik.org article:
[…] For over two years, the Commission has wanted to oblige internet services to scan the content of their users for criminal offenses and send it to the authorities in the event of suspicion. For almost a year now, the Parliament has described this as mass surveillance and has called for only unencrypted content of suspects to be scanned. […] The EU Commission demands that internet services scan their users’ content for three types of criminal content: known child pornography, new material and grooming. For known material, there are established systems for matching unencrypted content with hashes. This technology alone has been criticized. […] A majority of states also agree with the new proposal.
Ten states even emphasize that “the current proposal has reached the limit of their willingness to compromise”. […]
The EU Commission emphasizes that its draft law and the current proposal also cover encrypted content. The Commission believes it is “still necessary to have the possibility of detection in encrypted communications” - i.e. to override encryption. […]
Other states also reject the current proposal. Six states "stated that they could not agree to the proposal due to fundamental concerns.
[…]
The Legal Service of the EU member states supports the critics. Last year, the experts came to the conclusion that chat control is contrary to fundamental rights and will fail in court. These concerns have “still not been dispelled”. The lawyers also believe “that the proposal would not stand up to judicial review” - i.e. it is illegal.
[…] If either France or Italy - or two states from the Netherlands, Belgium and the Czech Republic - reject the new proposal, there will still be no majority in the Council.
[…] The Hungarian Council Presidency is sticking to its optimistic timetable. Hungary actually wanted to “further negotiate the proposal at a technical level”. That would be the Council working group on criminal prosecution. It met today, but did not discuss the chat control. Instead, the advisors for justice and home affairs are to negotiate the Hungarian proposal on Monday. If Hungary has its way, the Permanent Representatives will then decide on the Council’s position, followed by the Justice and Home Affairs Ministers on October 10. France and Sweden are “explicitly” in favor.
The EU isn’t just one simple entity, it’s doing good things and bad things at the same time. Considering the recent election of the parliament, ‘security’-focused rethoric seems to resonate with the people.
To be fair, conservatives have been wanting this for a long time and this isn’t something entirely new.
Please read my comment carefully, I did not do that. It is pretty obvious that the dynamics of how groups work and how you get people to believe in certain goals are pretty universal. Populism is designed to abuse how everyone perceives and judges outside information for political gain. Therefore it is viable for any political orientation. Other strategies are very significant as well (left&right). Populism can be found on the left and the right and should be criticized everywhere.
I honestly think you’re just throwing around buzzwords, how is all of this this directly related to fascism? You’re essentialy making fascism appear pretty harmless by using it as a catch-all phrase.
And if you can’t be friendly to people with different opinions, your opinions are only a result of one-sided socialisation, not of discussion and reflection with the help of others. And therefore on the same level as any other unreflected opinion.