So melodramatic. Until all the billionaires are executed this is the system you and I both will exist within.
Have a few more hits from the bong while I go collect rents from my serfs.
So melodramatic. Until all the billionaires are executed this is the system you and I both will exist within.
Have a few more hits from the bong while I go collect rents from my serfs.
Well, isn’t it kind of obvious that the current solutions are the best solutions we have at present?
Yes, wealth is not distributed equally, as has been the case since the dawn of time.
It would be great to solve that, but in the mean time we need to settle for doing our best.
The organisation isn’t the hard part its the motivation.
… but in the existing system suppliers are provided with the best imaginary numbers by sending things to places people want to buy it.
If only there was some way consumers could choose whether to buy something cheap and disposable or expensive and robust. Some kind of system whereby you could evaluate items and consider repairability prior to purchase.
Not necessarily. If ever producer sent their stuff to “rich places” there would be an excess in those places causing a reduced price.
We have some of the same gear - I have those exact clamps, and that makita driver.
I’d love to be able to organise all this stuff. My shed is just too small and I have too much stuff and too little motivation.
Oh man.
If only there were some way we could incentivise suppliers to supply the correct amount to different regions. Like some kind of reward or financial incentive for applying the correct amount? /s
Hyperbole.
Yes some things are wasted, that doesn’t mean they can be redistributed to solve scarcity.
It means its not economically viable to get those things to the people who need them.
Amazing. I can’t believe no one else has thought of this “restoration” life hack over the millennia /s.
Those greedy corporate assholes have an incentive to maintain an efficient distribution system. They dont make money by throwing food away. Any system has some waste.
Here its not really possible to discard furniture that might be usable. When you go to the rubbish dump with a load of stuff someone inspects what youve got and directs you to sort recyclables and furniture and stuff that someone may want. Only real waste ends up in landfill.
I dont really understand im sorry.
Yes, wealth is distributed unfairly.
However, the value of spoiled food and the existence of discarded furniture isn’t really evidence of anything? Practically by definition, no one wants that stuff, even hungry and / or homeless people.


“whole” other thing. It’s a phrase. In this meaning you raise a valid point but it doesn’t detract from what I’m saying.


Well, that’s a whole other thing really.
“Small” Governments outsource lots of work to consultancies - usually owned by the wives of elected officials.


Nah, I’m pretty sure they actually believed they could make things more efficient.
Yes, they also wanted to steal some data and tidy up some dissenters, but they did think they could achieve their stated objective.


As a non-american this is one of the most striking things about the Trump presidency.
Laws are made through a long process of consideration, debate, and revision. Govt institutions regulate and apply laws with extensive transparency and oversight. Its decentralised, cautious, and robust.
Conversely, Trump just decrees whatever he feels at any given time.
My point is, people from his own party should be outraged that theyre being side lined, and are unable to represent their constituents interests.
Times have changed, but just 10 years ago it was common in Australia for a political party to replace their own leader for similar reasons even when that party leader was prime minister.


Well, a lot of them would go to jail, they would be victims!
Wow this is so… sane.
Being childish and reductive I wanted to downvote anything supporting Brave, but I find you’ve challenged my views on this.
That said, I think I’m just going to re-frame my dislike for Brave users by assuming they’re all crypto-weirdos.


Woah, citric acid powder?
Never used containers on synology.
Seems weird to me that there’s an AIO container that seems to contain other containers, but anyway I guess thats a synology thing.
Maybe this is obvious to everyone else but… all those containers are “starting” because theyre waiting for one other container to finish “starting” before starting up themselves.
I agree that the redis warnings seem benign.
Weird that nextcloud is waiting for a db but postures says its ready.
Is the 404 in the master container logs from you trying to access the instance in your browser?
I assume there’s some kind of compose.yaml as part of the AIO project you’re installing which will reveal which containers “depends_on” which other containers so you could figure out which one is blocking you.