☭CommieWolf☆

  • 7 Posts
  • 450 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 3rd, 2022

help-circle












  • Yeah, I’ve been wondering this as well. It makes so little sense but I’m guessing it just makes for shiny propaganda. I was never convinced by the argument that “Humanoid robots are better suited to working in environments that were built for humans”, like, WE are the ones who make these environments, wouldn’t it just make more sense to rebuild the facility to be more efficient for cheaper and more sensible machinery, rather than invest exponentially more to replace all the humans with robots?

    It’s like saying “Cars were designed with humans in mind, so if we want self driving cars we need to put a humanoid robot driver in the drivers seat”.





  • This seems magnitudes worse, at least with the industrial revolution, you could argue that labor wasn’t being fully eliminated, but re-distributed and re-oriented to mass production and factory work. AI is the total ELIMINATION of human labor altogether. Even with other big tech advancements like the internet, it still created work in terms of all the infrastructure that had to be built, the expertise required to maintain and improve it, as well as generally creating many jobs that could not exist without the internet.

    AI is the only situation I see where it can completely remove humans from the system, even for the purpose of maintenance and upkeep, it could do that on it’s own. The infrastructure? It already exists. What do we as workers get from this? What’s left to look forward to?