To paraphrase a German comedian (I’m not even sure who said it).
Women, if you want a man, don’t be subtle. Stop with the playing with your hair and the dreamy looks. Men are stupid. They don’t pick up on that. If you want him, go to him, and say “You, me, sex!”
(Slightly adapted to fit the medium text better.)
That image you linked requires authentication to download.
I think the homeowners are right regardless. You don’t need to be a genius to figure out that even a moderately higher population density increases transportation demand. Even doubling the density could affect traffic considerably.
Now before the haters come out: I’m not saying that the transportation demand must be addressed by more or bigger roads.
Look at the last table in my original post. It contains 26 columns (A–Z), some of which are not shown, and 27 rows (blank–Z). There are 27 rows and 26 columns, regardless of the contents of the table. If the top-left cell (A, blank) were a 1 and (B, blank) were a 2, then (Z, blank) would contain a 26, and ZZ would contain a 702. Nothing about the layout of that table changes.
To summarize: The table will always be lopsided, if you start counting at 0 or at 1.
Like every name in IT in the last 10 years.
“Windows App”
“Rust”
<every goddamn hot beverage>
The stars at the right edge of that image seem to smear out to the right – significantly more than the stars in the center or at the left edge.
Could you explain why that is?
Also, what’s with that odd aspect ratio of 5,889 x 4,416 pixels?
Why is the 23rd shorter than the 21st and the 22nd? Why does the data and at midnight (?) between the 23rd and 24th? Why are the lines so curvy? Were there multiple polls per day?
This graph is not in my top-100 of data visualizations.
The argument stays the same. Only every index gets incremented.
Eure Spielplätze haben Schilder mit Namen drauf?
heinously written stuff that wasn’t expected to be in service even in the '90s.
Nothing more permanent than a temporary solution.
Ist ok, wir sprechen auch nicht was auch immer dein Post ist.
On a more serious note: If anyone can just claim anything in a conversation, that would be detrimental to any discussion. Either everybody makes up their own “facts” because no-one bothers proving everyone else’s version of a story (which is just everybody lying in everybody’s face); or everybody is constantly fact-checking everyone else, which makes the conversation take much longer than necessary.
You already have the source, or at least an idea in which context you got the information and how to find it again. It’s just common courtesy to share it the others rather than making them do the work, too.
Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
Interesting. They chose not to use any background music, not even sound effects. They really sell that the protagonist is deaf.
Oh, nevermind. It was muted.
Mir ist nie aufgefallen, was „verabschieden” für ein dämliches Wort in diesem Kontext ist.
Die Leute im Bahnhofsviertel können sich doch auch Drogen leisten. Du gibst nur zu viel Geld für Unsinniges wie eine Wohnung oder Essen aus.
Removed by mod
How I show up to work during my mandatory vacation:
(there’s nothing there)
bow.gif
I think I saw one that wasn’t from me.
Massive disrespect for not learning a thing.