well done >:[

happy for you >:[

Wie nichtmal versucht wird das glaubhaft zu gestalten Xd

Faschos

Thanks for the info and phasing it with nuance!!

Anything else would be in danger of falling into the “Nirvana fallacy” category

Depression resistance +1000

Ich dachte, dass automatisch alles gelöscht wird innerhalb einiger Stunden, wäre eh eine Pflichteinstellung

The good old 360 days of quickly opening the message menu to flame someone ingame ,but then taking 20 years to type out all the letters

No >:[ buy from MY Europe

Bestanden

???

😂

Oh wow, theres more to this discussion, nicely useful!

says:

evaluate on case-by-case basis

So its kind of in a grey zone, not reliable doesnt mean bad source in that case. Useful link, altough wikipedia is also a grey zone in the sense that its information based on open source (everybody can edit it, and most liked proposals get through as I understand)

Thanks for the confirmation

Well what ground news wants to do -critical evaluation and media literacy- is so vital.

But ground news deciding on what exact position on the spectrum a source is, seems to achieve the exact oposite: make people depentend in questioning and finding a variety of sources.

Nowadays everything needs to happen in an instant.

If theres a solution that only takes half a snap, that will be the only relevant choice for the mass. Thats why Im instantly asking, because just today I referred to this source to someone else as a might-be-bad example but instantly realized, I will have to ask this on the next situation (now)

Anyways thanks for the correction!

by a first glance just discovering this, looks like narcissism.

They will do everything - like deleting the obvious - before allowing being on par with the people they initially disagreed with

but I thought big corpo is there to create jobs!

Test

maybe as European im not too well versed in US sources and judged too harsh based on anecdotal experience. All the news Ive seen are always on the “nothing has been said” or “thats reaching” side.

my bad then

sorry for derailing a little:

why is there multiple links to choose from as a source? What exactly created that choosable format - are they automated, is this some system like groundnews or something?

the power of layout in graphic design

If only we’d put those things in front of tree groups near highways, that somehow still exist

is newsweek considered a serious source? even this objectively right seeming headline is kind of a nothingburger, isnt it?

sorry for derailing. if thats not tolerated, i will stop