I have found that ML’s tend to refuse to accept alternative views when supported by similar sources. Almost as if they are not interested in political philosophy or discussion but rather have just memorised doga and get worked up when you push passed their talking points.
Im pretty sure its the exact opposite.
Not really. I mean yes Anarchists believe that the state inherently breeds authoritarianism and should not be seized but abolished. However, most Anarchists believe in horizontal systems of governance with no centralisation of power, which is different to communism.
Anarchists believe and they are correct, that Marxism, M-L ect are authoritarian and violent.
No actor is paid the same as any other actor wyd?
They each have an individual value in the industry. Like if the rock is acting alongside Jennifer Aniston then the rock is obviously going to be paid more.
Non anglo-saxons
So everyone? Ain’t any Anglo Saxon around since that little old conquest of 1066
The left hand always been authoritarian, far left marxist-Leninist believe in authoritarianism, just their style compared to the rights fascist style.
Modern progressivism is the left being socially authoritarian. People who identify with a political ideal or side typically don’t care for objective truths.
Even if you wanted to break him out, he’s here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Detention_Center,_Brooklyn
Good fucking luck.
There’s simply nothing to do but wait for his case.
Nothing to do but get the prisons blueprints, have said blueprints tattooed onto body but covertly hidden within a being design. Then commit a serious but non violent crime to land yourself in the prison and then prison break
Won’t matter.
He’s up against the state who have shown that I f they have to break their own laws they will
But doesn’t that just affect his state charges? Aren’t his federal charges the one that are the real issue?
This is where i struggle agreeing with Marx, i find him to be selectively pragmatic and idealistic whenever the former or latter is convenient.
He acknowledges human nature is to oppress or be oppressed, as even in prehistoric human groups leaders would have formed and social rules enforced, we can assume this from our experiences in social groups. Yet does not believe that communism would lead to centralised oppression despite his historical studies, to me its either he chooses to ignore this factor or people misinterpret his writing and they cannot be applied in a post industrial capitalism society.
But is human nature not more acutely observed within the view of coercion, control and oppression? Marx says himself that the human history is defined by class wars between the haves and the have nots, with or without capitalism we will have a system that expresses control and oppression.
But you’ll believe USSR reports? To me, viewing your claims in this comment thread, you seem to dismiss anything that doesnt fit your narrative as baised or uninformed.