LOL, statutory rape is okay when the predator is hot LOLOL

Do feel free to fuck off.

You misspelled porn.

This is a clown shit comment, so I’m gonna clown on it. You are a clown. 🤡

You think they had any schooling? You’re very kind.

Also, it was the left that didn’t want to abolish slavery or give women rights.

I simply cannot imagine how anyone could be so stupid that they’d read or hear this and repeat it without looking into if it’s true or not (it’s not), yet there are so many idiots, typically Americans, just as stupid or possibly stupider than you on the internet spouting obvious propaganda that this level of idiocy must be pretty common in the States.

Do fuck off with your Israeli propaganda.

It was anally sourced, their citations all point to the American Proctological Society.

They’re a troll, don’t feed them.

Teach your children to watch where they step, simple as.

Tankies: the “woke” of room temperature IQ Lemmings.

To be fair, what yanks call donating plasma is a misnomer. This confuses the rest of the world, who would call it what it actually is: selling plasma.

Coulda fooled me since you’re spouting conservative American propaganda.

ROFLMAO. This bloke. Fucking Americans.

We absolutely see lots of news about these violent communist uprisings. Definitely not something you’re imagining. Not at all.

Yeah, those tankies sure love rich capitalists.

I’d rather set the three of them up as a human centipede, then have the first drink bleach.

Lol, he’s a terrible businessman because he’s so dumb. He’s a decent con artist and has always had enough family money to bounce back from his many failures.

You’re responding to a follow-up comment from a different user who is disagreeing with the first comment as if they’re the author of the original comment and their clear dissent is actually them agreeing with themselves somehow. Of course, you’re arguing with anyone who points out you’re confused.

Literal fucking insanity, mate.

Wow indeed. We’re only a few comments deep, so you can see the comment. This one:

Continuing the analogy, government agencies can absolutely eavesdrop on in-person conversations unless you expend significant resources to prevent it. This is exactly what I believe will happen - organized crime will develop alternate methods the government can’t access while these backdoors are used to monitor less advanced criminals and normal people.

I challenge you to show where it suggests a “want for uncompromising privacy is a US only thing.” Then point out where they show support for government access to communications.