

that was my conclusion as well, but I clicked the link before coming to the comments and had to just stare in shock for a moment
Please ignore me, I’m just here to look through your trash.
was: @RaccoonBall@Lemm.ee


that was my conclusion as well, but I clicked the link before coming to the comments and had to just stare in shock for a moment


now you’ve got three ovens


Our family does secret santa, and my person bought me nothing but AI gen shirts.
And not “hmm I wonder if this was generated” but like “wtf is that deformed thing there”
i was agreeing with you and listing another category of person for which their advice didn’t fit
mate is pretty alright too
there’s no such thing as an animal or plant that is invasive in the general sense
when you say something is invasive, you need to specify where
and housing conditions: just open the curtains on your big well lit windows!
windows 3.1 supported coloured cursors
source: am old. used coloured cursors on 3.1
agreed. he did.
my comment was mostly about PhD level being a nonsense term when speaking about general intelligence rather than depth of knowledge in a specific field
Do you know many PhDs? Being thrown off by a web search isn’t that unbelievable.
Half the ones I know can barely operate their email
for similar reasons cracked camera lenses take perfectly normal pictures
definitely a bit counter intuitive at first


i don’t want it either, but AFAIK they’re local models so the data didn’t go anywhere


the poorest half of humanity does not have half the wealth
you’re stuck on that interpretation but its not what the words mean
if you sort everyone richest to poorest and then cut the group in half at the midpoint so an equal number if people lie on each side, the poorest half do not have half the wealth
Mine asked the same questions every week as if he was caught in a time loop.
He had little understanding of what we were doing and couldn’t remember the answers we gave from one week to the next.


if whoever runs this bot reads this: why? what’s the point in spamming Lemmy with these worthless comments?


wrong Ford


There’s a difference between the position that something can be determined unacceptable with the given context and arguing against wanting more context
if so, they’re optimistic about their uptime