Pretty sure bitlocker is enabled by default since Windows 11 rolled, to my understanding it’s part of the reason they now require Microsoft accounts for device on boarding.

Fair. Maybe I’m just feeling lazy.

You running the cable for my hardwired ones or…? Cause $50 for eufy/ring/whatever is way cheaper than having an electrician run the cabling and if they’re bringing wi-fi jammers to the robbery they’re premeditated and definitely taking your shit regardless of the system so it ends up a problem for your insurance company regardless.

My issue is with the publisher and this article, linking me outside of it does nothing as my statement was not directed towards the content.

What a nothing burger. Either provide evidence, advisory, or speculation. This article just stokes fear for clicks with no actual substance.

If you’ve got credit card paranoia, Privacy.com has a solution for you. I personally just rely on my credit cards theft/fraud protection programs.

Agreed.

I somewhat share this sentiment but I was also just answering the question. There are actual reasons one would want to host documentation/etc on a already realized provider vs infrastructure they’d have to configure and potentially pay for themselves.

Takes time and resources to setup a web page. Takes 5 seconds to spin up a discord server or a telegram group and they handle all access control. Not my preference, but for ease of deployment a lot of people prefer to launch there.

Whoever was implanted with this was restricted to having lost complete motor function and likely had extremely poor quality of life, opting for this procedure as a last hope. I get you’re making a joke but I hope you understand it’s at the expense of someone in a terrible situation who’s undergoing a significant amount of suffering and likely was prior to any interaction with Musk.

I don’t personally disagree, but I don’t know what sort of business challenges they face. Also I should add that 132 Million number isn’t traffic or transactions, that’s verified customers that have made at least 1 purchase. That all being said there is definitely a redesign/restructure/rebase needed, but the ship takes crew to keep it sailing even if it needs remodeled/repaired/etc.

Not sure where I said anyone is evil. Just that people dismiss parallels that clearly exist at opposite ends of their moral compass because they want to feel morally comfortable in their choices without actually considering them, especially when they’re ones they’ve been making for a long time. In my personal opinion we’re past the point where we need to process animals for consumption and (America) has gotten to the point where it is borderline concerning how separated from our food we are, but I’d draw short of villifying anyone simply because we’re all creatures of the mud flying on a big mud ball across an seemingly infinite universe and to claim black/white good/bad as objective in that regard would be overstepping my understanding of reality.

Sites at that scale that cannot afford errors, downtime, or system breaches operate massive IT teams just to keep the systems running. That’s before even touching Logistics,Advertising, customer service, seller outreach, brand management, human resources, etc, etc. Ebay in 2023 had 132 Million customers. That’s 12,000 customers per employee per year, or 32 customers per employee per day assuming they worked the full 365 solid. A rather lean storefront actually, probably propped up significantly by the labor of their third-party sellers.

A lot of people will unfortunately not see the parallels. 1. Because they’ve been too far separated from where their food comes from 2. Because it’s human to go out of one’s way to mentally dismiss concerns when they regard something they’ve been doing for a long time. Oh and 3. For bonus points is just “A cow is just an animal, but a dog is a pet!”

Lol if that was the end of it instead of them writing up an entire article on how the said feature is ‘cruel’ and ‘too far’, it’d be a different story. Maybe read the article?..

How very entitled to take someone else’s creation and decide which parts of it are “too far”. This form of journalistic media can be done well when the emotional tones include reflection and philosophy but all that’s here is ranting and a complete lack of introspection. Author should probably find a day job but who am I to say.

If I had to add anything I’d just say keep in mind your DNA is not a static measurement. There are plenty of mutations and changes over your lifespan and within different cells themselves. You may want to generate a fantasy way of handling this.

If it’s not receiving security patches then it’s not a good candidate to use for 2factor. Risks are low but anything without security patches becomes a minor speed bump to bypass as published exploits will likely exist that are trivial to implement.

I think you know the answer deep down in your heart. Embrace the wall, live the garden.

It’s a massive game that was absolutely a labor of love, but it’s Rockstar we’re talking about here. They turn love into microtx and milk it till it’s dry. Then it’s to the meat packing facilities for a little mobile/console porting so it’s innards can be broken up to be resold 😂. No real fault to the devs, art team, and story team that absolutely did put love into the game though.