

In any given situation, that will make things worse for the child.
Ehhhh. Sorta? Not in the way that I think you think. This will be a thing, but it’ll be for people who were otherwise mentally disabled.
You’d be surprised the mental diversity of adults, especially in the US. Like apparently some fraction of adults with a whole number on the denominator are functionally illiterate, yet they don’t need assisted living homes.
Good as any.
What exactly is your plan for when someone without a license is found with a baby?
Reminder that there legally cannot be a crime such as “failure to provide identification” outside of specific contexts like actively operating a vehicle, etc. Lots of states allow cops to require you to provide your legal name (and sometimes address) when detained, and courts usually have the ability to compell the same.
Eh. There’s a balance. “Introduce yourself” is open ended enough.
The feds also like to criminally prosecute people if they do transactions that can be construed to be avoiding the reporting limit.
“Could”
Yeah and 100% of jobs “could” vanish if your mom is allowed to “roam free”
I forget which article but I remember that a teacher wrote something and it said that students were using ChatGPT to answer “introduce yourself.”
An LLM doesn’t do search. It regurgitates the statistically most likely next words based on its training data.
Just because your argument is fallacious doesn’t mean the conclusion is wrong.
“Black people are hot therefore they should be treated equally” is an example that I can immediately come up with.
“Honour killing” yet you have none.
Roffle, how could you do this to us?
Headline is lying.
Abstract of study is:
Extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and intense due to climate change. Yet, little is known about the relationship between exposure to extreme events, subjective attribution of these events to climate change, and climate policy support, especially in the Global South. Combining large-scale natural and social science data from 68 countries (N = 71,922), we develop a measure of exposed population to extreme weather events and investigate whether exposure to extreme weather and subjective attribution of extreme weather to climate change predict climate policy support. We find that most people support climate policies and link extreme weather events to climate change. Subjective attribution of extreme weather was positively associated with policy support for five widely discussed climate policies. However, exposure to most types of extreme weather event did not predict policy support. Overall, these results suggest that subjective attribution could facilitate climate policy support.
So it measures politics. Not action. Two different things.
Did the headline just tell me that, enshitification, something which is always by design, is by design?