
Yeah, run it into the ground
I am the crab that pinches your butt, Dirt Owl
Oh, and if Hexbears are libs, then I must be the libiest of all libs
However, if you’re anti-communist, I’ll be anti-anti-communist, just like how conservatives are anti-antifa
Tovarshi/Tongzhimen
Yeah, run it into the ground
Martin Oliner deserves to get :redacted: , I tell ye hwat.
That would be Lemmygrad.ml
So technically we’re second most tankiest
We’re just the most largest one.
Lemmy.blahaj.zone or Hexbear.net (depending on your politics)
For the latter, a good community is
c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns
(Note: yes, c/ means community or just comm for short)
There’s also the transgender community in Lemmy.ml
Right, so he hit dementia more quickly than someone at the same age… huh, America’s decade of humiliation is not finished yet.
Remember when he signed the permission for retreating from Afghanistan? We know how that went
Hmm… the question is how do they get a hold of em and
Prolly another rivaling billionaire, if their stake in capital hurts more with him in power. But that seems unlikely
Oh yeah. Matrix is good as well…
“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.
"If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”
deleted by creator
(Cover up means the lack of wild speculation and hysterical media coverage shoving cameras in the faces of bereaved relatives and blurring out mutilated corpses)
Welp, unfalsfiable orthodoxy aside from the state-affiliated ABC news, I hope the people in the palengke are alright.
I second this motion of Betteridge… already, Trump starting to act like an Amerikkkan version of Boris “Privatization” Yeltsin. Well, I guess I oughta check Project 2025 for a bit
Nice un
Correction: that’s the Office of Strategic Services, long before it consolidated into the anti-communist, pro-western imperialist CIA…
The fuck… suicides are bad enough, but child suicides? Tf…
Woohoo - caught a big fish - 1 million dollars.
What can I say? The British gov’t wants more austerity. So, they decided to compensate with this…