Also at @me@social.k3can.us on Mastodon.

  • 1 Post
  • 51 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle

  • For sure.

    I have several of the Google WiFi pucks, myself. Flashing them wasn’t too complicated, but it does involve disassembly. One of them was my primary router for a while, until it was eventually replaced by a banana pi. It handled the typical routing tasks, plus ad blocking, a VPN, etc. without issue.

    Like I said, I believe there’s an nginx package for OpenWRT, serving static web pages should be trivial. If I recall correctly, it only has 8gb of sausage and a half gig of RAM, though. Plenty for a router or static web server, but not a lot of resources for anything too complex. I wonder if you could squeeze a GoToSocial instance in there… That might be fun, actually. I’ve been tinkering with Home Assistant lately, but maybe once that’s “finished”, GTS on a WiFi puck might be my next project. Hm…


  • Neither the Google WiFi nor an RPI make a good nas server, but either would certainly work. Some routers even have m.2 or USB connectors specifically for that reason.

    For a simple web server, there’s even an nginx package for OpenWRT, so you have reverse proxying and basic web hosting on that Google puck with just a couple clicks.

    Another interesting possibility is putting a tftp server on your router, and using it as a pxe server.

    Plenty of options, if you don’t mind the performance.







  • You don’t say what you’re using Cloudflare for, so suggesting an alternative is a bit tough.

    Assuming that you’re using a CF tunnel to get through CGNAT, tailscale would be one alternative (no need to turn it off/on, though). The other alternative would be renting a cheap VPS and tunneling through that instead.

    On the other hand, if you’re primarily using CF as a reverse proxy, you can run any number of them on your own server instead, like Nginx, Zoraxy, etc.

    On the other other hand, if you’re using their WAF, that can also be run locally. Crowdsec offers a WAF component in addition to their usual protections, for example.

    On the other other other hand… There are alternatives to most, if not all, of their other services, too.








  • The slightly lower power draw pi5 vs a Tiny will eventually make up for the higher initial cost, but you can save more by turning off lights when you leave a room or skipping a round at the bar.

    In my opinion, the wider software compatibility, better processing power, and expansible RAM and storage options far outweigh the eventual theoretical savings.

    That said, if you need the super small SBC form factor or GPIO pins, definitely go for a pi. They absolutely have their use cases. I have 4 or 5 of the 3B and 3B+, and have used them on-and-off for a variety of tasks over the years.