You’re making it sound like it’s choosing to misgender her, it’s not. It’s not fucked up because it’s a text extruder making a mistake, there’s no good or bad intention here. It’s shitty because the current state of glorified hallucinating autocorrects is shitty, but not because evil Grok is choosing to do anything.
I’d say for me magical realism has been 2025’s “Genre of the year” so I have a few recommendations.
If you like Murakami you might like Sayaka Murata - I particularly liked Earthlings, it’s a bit less magical realism but definitely quirky and surreal.
Remarkably Bright Creatures by Shelby Van Pelt was another book that stood out to me this year. It’s an emotional story with a young man and an older woman which uses a very smart octopus as the main character and anchor for the story (even though I wouldn’t consider the story is about the octopus).
Black Girl Unlimited by Echo Brown is firmly magical realism, and also quite good.
Nothing To See Here by Kevin Wilson is about a young woman who gets roped into babysitting two kids that spontaneously combust from time to time. It’s lighthearted but emotional, and I was laughing out loud about once every 5 pages. I had a blast with this one.
I would also class Jandy Nelson’s books as magical realism so I would say you might enjoy that too.
Then there’s This Is How You Lose The Time War, which I didn’t like at all, but has many good reviews so I won’t discredit it. It’s… Space fantasy? There’s no “science” in the fiction, but it has time travel, and weirdness galore.
This is my list of books I’ve read in 2025, in case you find anything inspiring:
And my storygraph profile in case you want to take a look (or not, I won’t be able to know!).
For me I think it was Atmosphere, by Taylor Jenkins Reid. So many emotions lol.
Project Hail Mary was another one of the highlights!
Yeah, I’m not going to defend training AI with copyrighted works… But I’m not going to waste energy siding with anyone who was okay with X. If you stayed in X, you’vr made your own bed. Now don’t cry because the owner is an AI-pandering nazi, we all knew that already.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bT77XP52uw&t=73
“See no path oh soo bay see no path oh SOO BEE RAAAY”
I did not speak french when I was six. I do now, but apparently that doesn’t automatically translate memories from thirty years ago. It took me about 5 years of actively looking for this to find it. I found it by asking in a big forum (not reddit but that sort of thing) for something like “people driving cars deforesting space with lasers”.
Capitalism loves using supply and demand to justify anything… up until it’s time to lower the price to adapt to low demand.
Still debatable, the weights are the code. That’s a bit like saying “X software is not open source because it has equations but it doesn’t include the proofs that they’re derived from”.
I have a Xiaomi, which typically is on the bad list of “dontkillmyapp” but with a bit of knowledge and care I’ve had zero issues.
You just have to know not to let the phone kill apps if you don’t want them killed 🤷♂️ but I guess many users can’t understand that.
I get that vivo phones aren’t supported, but the energy and messaging is very off here. “Vivo - no, lol” “open an issue or buy pixel”.
There’s no need to be a condescending dick to your users, you can just write “phones with aggressive task managers might kill the app and break updates”.
Plus I don’t think anybody sane is “buying pixel” just to access a widget app. 🙄
In 2025? Is that even a thing?
Yeah the article is quite clear but the headline isn’t. I struggle to consider “left-wing” a party that is clearly right-wing on many social issues.
Specific example from this very budget: increasing taxes on electric cars might be economically more taxing on more affluent people, but the implied message is “buy a petrol car instead” which isn’t a left-wing idea at all. Why are petrol cars not taxed per mile (but more aggressively)? Why are cars not taxed relative to cost - how is a 2.5 ton Hybrid Range Rover cheaper to tax than an electric Renault 5 (for say, 10000 miles a year), and how is that left wing???
Agree. If you could go into every single store, house, nook and cranny of Cyberpunk 2077, and talk to all the NPCs, it would feel absolutely humongous. Gameplay significantly affects perceived size.
Ah sorry government - you guys rejected the option to regulate porn. Nowadays nobody watches porn in the UK, people watch it “from Switzerland” instead. Go ask them to regulate.
In Oxford we have a few distinct fashion tribes for sure. My favourite ones are the poor rich student, wearing jagged clothes but carrying a £6k digital Leica, and the middle aged people wearing hiking-chic (Patagonia and Arcteryx rather than Barbour).
Guardian Bikes. They’re opening a factory in Indiana.
That’s quite frequent. My Not-a-doctor, simplified understanding is:
Caffeine doesn’t target processes related to dopamine but it’s a stimulant. Outside of hyperfocus mode, ADHD brains are constantly understimulated because the lack of dopamine makes things not feel engaging and interesting. This is why our thoughts race, our brain is struggling to find ALL THE THINGS (thoughts, hobbies, worries, plans, memories) that might give it the stimulation it needs.
Since coffee is a stimulant, the brain gets what it’s looking for and doesn’t need to race through all the possible thoughts, it’s happy. The two main problems are:
So the topics discussed are sci-fi, and politics. Not technology then.
Who’s “Glenn” and why does he belong in “Technology”? Is he a robot?
What does this post about people ramblings have to do with Technology?
I think it’s ok, the comment literally says “according to Lisuan”. Which I see as factually correct - that’s the marketing claim, or the performance according to them, just like Teslas have been self-driving according to Tesla since 2012.