Just change lemmy.post.create to lemmy.post.createe to trigger an AttributeError. That way you can debug the code without creating any posts. You can also use many print statements all around the code, I would use two for each line to make sure the computer isn’t fooling you. Lastly, you can spin up your own Lemmy instance to not have to worry about the generated posts.

Testing.

https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/03-votes-and-ranking.html

Edit: I was wrong the ranking that works like forums is New Comments and yes it seems to take into account the OP comments.

deleted by creator

The paper actually demonstrates a 16-million context window with 92% accuracy. Most models can be retrained to have a 100k context window with over 92% accuracy, but the accuracy drops to 74% at 256k. The code has already been released on GitHub as well. I’m excited to see the development of 100k models using this method soon!

You don’t have any idea of how GPT works. Read about it and then we can talk.

Comparing current LLMs with autocomplete is stupid. An autocomplete can’t pass law or biology exams in the 90th percentile like GTP-4 can.

Hopefully there are some people more positive than that, willing to change society so AGI doesn’t make most humans starve to death or be imprisoned.

I feel like this is what happened when you’d see posts with hundreds / thousands of upvotes but had only 20-ish comments.

Nah it’s the same here in Lemmy. It’s because the algorithm only accounts for votes and not for user engagement.

You can’t claim it’s different either, so? I’ll still claim whatever the fuck I want.

You can’t have a source to Reddit’s proprietary algorithms lol. Ask u/spez.

I personally prefer it colorful as it is, or even more colorful like Matt Wolfe’s Midjourney generated thumbnails. It’s a nice change of pace from the usual thumbnails.

Top Hour is the same as Reddit’s rising option.

I was thinking about this a few days ago. GANs and the Simulation Hypothesis: An AI Perspective

Locked in a room with an internet connection? A lot. But without any contact with the outside world? Not nearly as much. It could have other people running experiments for it with an internet connection, but not without one.

Anyway, whether or not the AGI can interact with the real world undermines the purpose of my explicit statement in the question. I specifically mentioned that it only operates as a human on a computer. I didn’t mention it could acquire a physical body, so let’s just assume it can’t and can’t use other people to do physical labor either.

I heard disruptive science is slowing down which I think means pretty much everything possible has already been thought of. So talking about things that exist, do you mean a cheaper solar panel or wind/water turbine? Or are we talking about science fiction like an Arc Reactor?

This sounds like science fiction. Even if the AGI were capable of creating plans for a fusion reactor, for example, you would still need to execute those plans. So, what’s the point of everyone having access to the plans if the same electrical companies will likely be responsible for constructing the reactor?

I honestly think that with an interesting personality, most people would drastically reduce their Internet usage in favor of interacting with the AGI. It would be cool if you could set the percentage of humor and other traits, similar to the way it’s done with TAR in the movie Interstellar.

I wouldn’t be surprised if corporations just asked the AI to make as much money as possible at the expense of everything else. But people like living in capitalist countries anyways, while complaining about the lack of safety nets. Otherwise they would move to countries like China, North Korea or Cuba.

26/12/2032 Metaculus - When will the first general AI system be devised, tested, and publicly announced?

18/Jul/2025 - Date predicted by GPT-4 based on the table

Roadmap: AI’s next big steps in the world – Dr Alan D. Thompson