I agree with this. However the very latest Pixels (with the stock ROM) might be a bit more invasive than the phones by an OEM like Motorola or Nokia.
Arch user btw.
I agree with this. However the very latest Pixels (with the stock ROM) might be a bit more invasive than the phones by an OEM like Motorola or Nokia.
Not really. A smartphone with a privacy-respecting OS and E2EE communication apps only is more secure. Though you can argue that it’s not really a phone if you don’t use the soter service.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
It’s not just about privacy. In this case it’s also about law evasion and possible hiding assistance.
Still the governments are so crazy now it can trigger them.
Why?
I think it’s obvious.
Can you ban FOSS apps nowadays?
Yes especially if it’s Australia.
Because that could easily make OSM banned in most countries?
The real thing is: can you update the microcode of older CPUs? If not then it’s a marketing strategy.
Breezy is probably the most mainstream rn.
Well since its design is pretty uncommon, a widget of the same style would look out of place on almost any setup.
That’s true but absolutely impossible to achieve.
No matter which model is adopted, the prime minister has said privacy protections will be introduced to cover any data people end up providing.
Sure. Now stop thinking of ridiculous legal aspects and fight for your privacy.
BIOS doesn’t matter for gaming as long as you don’t use modded GPU drivers.
KDE always gets more stable after a lot of minor updater. But it can’t be completely stable and then big updates ruin everything anyways. KDE has a ridiculous update model for a serious project. There’s not enough testing.
Removed by mod