That’s the point.

You just can’t admit that women are right.

Searches the internet

Gets internet search results

“Yo what the fuck”

🤔❓🧑‍💻⌨️👉📝❓

1. Brain chemicals are a thing that exist.

2. Become one of today’s lucky 10’000

You believe in a thing called love?

ITT: Pizza cutters. All edge nay point.

Büt whāt æbœùt typīñg lîke thìß?

And just like that.

Jericho is no longer a washed up, out of shape, embarrassed old timer.

Im14andthisisdeep

ITT:Lemmites being reminded that they an old now. And struggling to come to terms with it.

They are also overplaying it in America.

Trump won the popular vote.

The average American wouldn’t be celebrating.

What exactly are they “tracking” anyway?

Santa.

Jesus Christ read the article.

Woah there.

We don’t read articles.

We just circle jerk over how obviously smarter than everyone else we are.

The fuck is Snowball II doing in Bart’s room.

Might as well spit on Groaning while you’re at it.

Tiger Knee position

This year DPW needs to win something.

Little of column A and little of column B.

The phrase is “Don’t work yourself into a shoot”

“Work” is part of the show. “Shoot” is not part of the show.

It’s why you might hear about “shoot fighting” in relation to MMA, especially on the Japanese side. Because MMA was born from pro wrestling.

But the term “Don’t work yourself into a shoot”. Basically means, don’t get so wrapped up in how a story is presented that you believe the story is “legit”. If your opponent is cutting a promo and calls you a bastard, he’s not legitimately calling you a bastard.

He worked himself into a shoot

Dude.

Having the bare minimum understanding, and repeating an experiment.

Doesn’t make me an AI bro.

I’m not saying it’s smart, or that it can reason, or any other words you’re trying to put in my mouth.

I am simply explaining how these systems work, in order to try and explain why these kinds of results occur.

Now how 'bout you do your peddling of LLMbeciles in a group that’s not literally called “Fuck AI”?

If we’re going to be saying fuck AI, then maybe we should understand how these systems work. Rather then just circle jerk over deliberately bad results. Otherwise we’re just acting the same way as the actual AI bros.

their favourite stochastic parrot is better than other stochastic parrots.

You’re the one with the deepseek account?

Genuinely don’t understand why you’re so mad at me. Maybe it’s because the sample size for my experiment was so low. I can fix that. Let’s run this through chatgpt a few more times.

(You’ll love this one because it got it wrong) (Untill I asked it to double check. Oops)

(Hey another wrong answer)

I can’t be bothered with getting a larger sample size, so combined with the previous non-search results.

That’s 4 times out of 6 it caught the trick at the start.

Isn’t science fun!

So here’s the Gemini result