Pretty hateful thing to say lol

I responded to exactly what you wrote. It’s not my job to read your mind and know that you actually meant something else. Cheers :)

Completely wrong.

Gay is same sex attraction. Nothing at all to do with gender and especially not gender identity.

Trans people and advocates call gay men who won’t date a trans man (a female) “bigots” and “transphobes”. They say that a male can be a lesbian, and if a lesbian won’t suck a “female penis” she is transphobic and a bigot. That’s homophobia, and like I said, it is rife in the TQ community.

Gay rights and trans rights are not compatible. One is based on sexual attraction, one is based on “gender identity”, the latter of which tries to force the former to not exist. The trans activists don’t even hide it - they call it “genital preference” and say it’s transphobic. That’s incredibly homophobic.

My name was randomly generated. Also “injustice” isn’t really applicable here, at least not yet.

Double jeopardy doesn’t work like this. Nothing is stopping him defending himself. The jury issue is real, but in his favour thanks to the left trying to make a murder it to be a hero.

Probably should have said that instead then, rather than talking about not convicting.

There’s that classic liberal attitude we all know and love.

How is the American government “fascist”?

It gets posted thousands of times because it’s true. “Nazi” Is the default attack by the far left. Someone *doesn’t * want free speech abolished? Nazi!

Oh so there isn’t a cost of living crisis, it’s just that only rich people are allowed to live there because of the nice climate?

WOW lol

Also lol at most desirable climate in the world. Let me guess - you live there?

It’s anti-democratic boo matter what paradox you want to try and spin it as.

This is one side who fears losing power trying to eliminate their political opponent who is rapidly gaining followers. It’s authoritarian, it’s anti-democratic, and it’s fascism. It’s LITERALLY WHAT THE NAZIS DID for crying out loud!

Democracy means the will of the people. The government banning the party that has the most supporters is the exact opposite of that.

And banning opposition parties is anti-democratic. Can you think of any other German government that banned opposing political parties?

There’s no way to stop a new party forming that gets all the same voters on board while meeting any rules required.

Cool made up things! Republicans are trying to ban you from saying gay people exist now? Source? Websites are being censored? Source?

Ah yes because the ALP have been so competent the last 3 years, haven’t they? No, they’ve been a complete shitshow.

The LNP are a shitshow too, and Dutton deserved to be nowhere near being prime minister, but let’s not sugar coat it - Labor have run the country into the ground. Can you name a single thing that has improved over the last 3 years?

Nothing more than a cost of business bill for China. Even the EC seems afraid to upset China.

Is this the speedboat equivalent of doing a wheelie across the finish line on a bike?

Glad they’re ok.

“Progressives”/Liberals are straight up begging for authoritarian dictatorships.

I missed when calling for smaller government, less regulations, less red tape, untouchable free speech, and less censorship suddenly became “fascism”.

First time on Lemmy/Reddit?

Also ironic is that banning political parties is not compatible with the free democratic order.

So say they ban them……then what? You think that the most popular political party in the country isn’t going to just reform again while complying with whatever rule got them banned in the first place? Of course they will, and they’ll have the same support, if not more due to the perceived anti-democratic banning of the AfD.

Next stop authoritarian dictatorship I guess? Just ban all elections so they can’t take power?

”We will continue to help, but we will no longer fly around the world as mediators in meetings,”

Not quite what the headline suggests happened.