Without examples it’s hard to say anything at all beyond guesses really.
But if the article is about a xitter meme, tweets are the original source, and therefore perfectly relevant citations.
Without examples it’s hard to say anything at all beyond guesses really.
But if the article is about a xitter meme, tweets are the original source, and therefore perfectly relevant citations.
Some people just dislike misinformation, regardless of whether it aligns with their world view.
There are plenty of real reasons homosexuality is natural, why invent fake ones?
okay so I had AI do the math for me.
“I drove a screw with a hammer”
oh my god thanks for linking that, the full body workout thread is truly painful!
I have died on dumber hills than arguing for 1 + 1 = 5.
What about gases, are gases wet or dry?
You say a gas is wet if it contains water, ok what about if the gas contains mercury, is that wet? Is pure liquid mercury wet or dry?
hahah yeah, ~50% is the new 1%, that’s certainly economically viable…
Oh wow, yeah that’s not that simple. Although using the banks as a tool in that is honestly pretty scary.
I’m not familiar with this, I would love to see counter arguments instead of silent down votes.
if you think you know what they’re testing for, you’ve been lied to.
Nah, it’s literally an old english word for elephant.
deleted by creator
I went the other way. I liked the simplicity, and thought what about MORE simplicity? I went to i3 and haven’t really looked back yet.
Do you have any other cardses?
Airplanes are vehicles, yet it won’t do you much good to take them to a car mechanic.
that reason is not sneakers
The ports should be grounded through the motherboard. The case should be grounded through contact with the PSU.
I’ve heard arguments it does some EMI shielding, which is probably technically correct, but with so many cases on the market having huge glass/clear plastic panels in their sides, leaving large gaping EMI holes, that doesn’t seem to matter much.
that one is merely cosmetic tho, no biggie.
“My momma always said, life was like a box of chocolates, you never know what you gonna get, you piece of shit!”
source: http://www.airimprovement.com/reports/national-e15-analysis-final.pdf
This gives us tha the 88 octane has 106.8/108.6 ≈ 0.983 times the energy density of the 87.
1-0.983 = 0.017
The correct number is that the 88 needs to be 1.7% cheaper than 87 to give equivalent distance per dollar.
LLMs are fantastic tech, good at many things. Math is not one of those things.