Thank you for having a conscience. I agree.
Thank you for having a conscience. I agree.
The pixelated look is fashionable at the moment. I wonder if that’s the reason.
It’s one thing to tweak a browser that comes in kit form from Mozilla’s code. It’s another thing altogether to continue maintaining it if Firefox ever dies. I don’t know if any of these clones have the kind of teams needed to do all the work Mozilla have done for them.
I don’t have it with me because I’m helping someone remotely, but I’m almost certain it’s a PS/2 connection from a previous video call we had. I’ll double check though because that’s a good point you make. I should look out for that possibility.
It could well do. I decided to order this late in the night so if it doesn’t work for me I’ll try your suggestion. Thanks! https://www.amazon.de/PERIPRO-401/dp/B008DFVQFW/ref=rvi_d_sccl_1/260-2568866-1570737?pd_rd_w=FRiWx&content-id=amzn1.sym.13dbab83-f61c-4000-b9ab-184f02ce8fa2&pf_rd_p=13dbab83-f61c-4000-b9ab-184f02ce8fa2&pf_rd_r=HT9EAC1V4RGHXEPB1BF8&pd_rd_wg=Q6vzX&pd_rd_r=dd445555-e090-4140-b4c8-fb5363e7c1c8&pd_rd_i=B008DFVQFW&th=1
Maybe the part I heard about is specially made to account for that too. Hmm. Thanks, I’ll look into it further. Edit: according to this video (3 minutes, 15 seconds mark), the adaptors do work.
That could solve a lot of my problems.
The “I don’t care if you go broke, give me what I want” stance I’m seeing online seems short-sighted at best and narcissistic at worst.
Good point. I think doing nothing at all is always a bad idea.
And even with hindsight I still don’t know if it would have been better to do the stuff, some of the stuff or nothing.
By Grabthor’s hammer, I have to agree.
That sounds promising, thanks! You say LAN, but I can share this with people over the internet too, right?
I don’t know what kind of authentication it uses, but it dots appear to be susceptible to brute force https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome/issues/242
But if I add a reverse proxy I would need it to just affect that one service/port. I’m running a publicly facing static (amateur/hobby) website - and other services - from there too and I’d prefer it to remain public.
Thanks again! Do I understand right that once I:
The machines will be able to see each other, but the machines can not be seen outside of the network of those machines?
Also, my Raspberry Pi is hosting some other publicly exposed services that need to remain that way. Will tail scale take over those too?
I found a nice overview video here for anyone who might want it: https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=Kzyolu9yn0E
Thanks. I really appreciate the insight. I’ll start learning about tailscale as a priority.
They do. The issue is that I already have a static site. I don’t want Jekyll or Hugo to overwrite those. I suppose I can choose which sections I push to Gitlab Pages. Maybe one of those would work in that case.
It is plain HTTP. There’s a username and password needed to log in and access the music, though if that helps?
Thanks for that. I’ll look into tail scale (since you mentioned the magic word, ‘simplicity’). My domain doesn’t have any links to the pages on my server, and Navidrome is username and password protected. Would that be safe enough? I am using unencrypted http, though.
Thanks. I’m happy enough with Navidrome but if I can try ASA in parallel I might give it a try sometime.
I really like the turntable effect in the Navidrome web app, though :)
The commentary will turn your brain to puree, though.