On the surface. But, you’re being rhetorical, in the original sense of the word. You can link words together but fail to do logic. You’re doing duckspeak, quack quack

You’re just gatekeeping, not looking at what makes art that

You have no comprehension of relevance.

The early 20th century? I’d say physical philosophy would beg to differ, and do you see how you just killed your own argument by citing a time period? I think ideas don’t have value and that intellectual property stifles innovation. You had me in the first half, where I assumed you meant that people don’t just intuit new ideas from nowhere, then you cited a date and lost me.

Easy. Don’t work a job or pay rent. Anarchism already exists. It just exists in the crannies (like right in front of you) where other domineering primates don’t beat you with sticks or boss you around. You don’t fix the system. You ignore it.

As an artist, all y’all need to chill. The problem is capitalism, and it’s not like artists make a living anyway. Democratizing art opens up a lot of possibilities, you technophobes.

You really should catch up with the rest of us on leftist ideology. Also, realize that the scary picture in your head with no government is exactly the world we live in, today, while the government simply wages wars for corporations and keeps itself intact by commodifying human behavior.

Is this guy on drugs?

Yes, calls to violence. I give no fucks about policy. My policy is that we should shoot cops in the face when we see them.

Hey, I might be able to become a Canadian refugee. Sweet

So, we don’t do government

Broadly gestures at the world

I’m going to add to this. Any homogenous system you suggest rejects the subjective nature of morality, and needs to be enforced through force. Unevolving, nonreactive, subject to rule by the majority. Consistently, we see that civilians favor policies most of us would agree with, but money interests prevail. I’m the Soviet Union, beaurocratic interests prevailed. That’s just what you get with centralized power, and humans needing to fulfill a role to provide for their families. Try to rally your neighbors in your immigrant community that black people shouldn’t be allowed in. Then, try to rally them around lowering rent. Finally, try to convince a piggie (the long arm of billionaires) to literally negotiate a single thing, or show up in a timely manner, or not forge documents.

That’s a decent idea. But, here’s another one: there’s no objective morality, obviously, but we do have a thing we can point to. Community collaboration, and the instincts we’ve developed as primates. We don’t need to be involved in international trade deals. We need to check on our neighbor when a grocery delivery is rotting in front of their door, or show up strapped when some loud motherfucker causes is causing issues. I propose that any semblance of objective morality lies in our genes and us being social primates. This whole civility thing is nothing but gaslighting authoritarianism.

Yup. I envision those existing. For example, In the area I come from, the “Bikers Against Child Abuse” exist. Maybe there’s a Bikers Against Bikers Against Child Abuse? It’s not pretty across the board, and if you peel back a single layer of the world right now, neither is it.

I’m thinking, more like, you and your neighbors arm yourselves and be in each other’s business.

As a rapper, I totally agree. I’ll go with: decentralized community defense would be far more effective than the police. And, you know. Wouldn’t be them.

This is refreshing to see after using reddit so long.

I’ve embraced existentialism. Finally found a definition of spituality I could digest and apply: “How you emotionally relate to the world.” Since then, I let my primitive, primate brain do things like feel jealousy and be wrong about things. Pretty freeing