My solution has been to left click , select “inspect element” to open the browsers HTML window.

Then zoom out the generator as far as it goes , and scroll down so the entire image gallery (or a part of it at least) is rendered within the browser.

The ctrl+c copy the HTML and paste it in notepad++ , and use regular expressions to sort out the image prompts (and image source links) from the HTML code

Not exactly a good fix , but it gets the job done at least.

Simple and cool.

Florence 2 image captioning sounds interesting to use.

Do people know of any other image-to-text models (apart from CLIP) ?

Wow , yeah I found a demo here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Qwen/Qwen2.5

A whole host of LLM models seems to be released. Thanks for the tip!

I’ll see if I can turn them into something useful 👍

That’s good to know. I’ll try them out. Thanks.

Hmm. I mean the FLUX model looks good

, so there must maybe be some magic with the T5 ?

I have no clue, so any insights are welcome.

T5 Huggingface: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/t5

T5 paper : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.10683

Any suggestions on what LLM i ought to use instead of T5?

Cool

New stuff

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03032

Takes only a few seconds to calculate.

Most similiar suffix tokens : "vfx cleanup |warcraft |defend |avatar |wall |blu |indigo |dfs |bluetooth |orian |alliance |defence |defenses |defense |guardians |descendants |navis |raid |avengersendgame "

most similiar prefix tokens : “imperi-blue-|bluec-|war-|blau-|veer-|blu-|vau-|bloo-|taun-|kavan-|kair-|storm-|anarch-|purple-|honor-|spartan-|swar-|raun-|andor-”

I count casualty_rate = number_shot / (number_shot + number_subdued)

Which in this case is 22/64 = 34% casualty rate for civilians

and 98/131 = 75% casualty rate for police

So its 64-131 between work done by bystanders vs. work done by police?

And casualty rate is actually lower for bystanders doing the work (with their guns) than the police?

I’m not even going to adress your post.

I’ve heard this lingo before.

Godamn redditors trying to infiltrate the perchance forums.

There’s no reasoning with this rhetoric

Agree.

IMO The owner of a generator should be entitled to remove content from their image gallery

IDGAF about peoples NSFW preferences , but I’ve had occasional past experiences with users on my generator (fusion gen) who post content for the sake of harassment.

For example scat , geriatrics , bugs and gore , or just writing messages in the prompt. This happens rarely, thankfully.

But having the tools at hand to remove/hide such content would be good.

I learn new stuff about Lemmy everyday. Thanks mate :)!