alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoIt's routinesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1844arrow-down113
arrow-up1831arrow-down1imageIt's routinesh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareMrSnowflake@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoMissed an exclamation mark (as in negation) would be better and happens to anyone.
minus-squareLetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkDeutscharrow-up1·1 year agoSomething is either true or false, I would expect to have at least 50% of a chance to get it right on the first try. Nah, I fail to implement it three times because my brain went on vacation without telling me.
Missed an exclamation mark (as in negation) would be better and happens to anyone.
Or using < instead of <= or >
Something is either true or false, I would expect to have at least 50% of a chance to get it right on the first try. Nah, I fail to implement it three times because my brain went on vacation without telling me.