• sdf05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is like that show “Upload”; the guy literally gets killed by a car

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should finish watching that first episode before making such bold statements.

      • Ocelot@lemmies.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean I think its still a valid point. The car in the show was sabotaged, and that is definitely something that might be a thing once all cars self-drive. Especially once they remove controls like steering wheels.

        There hasn’t been a tesla FSD hack yet, but it would take spoofing a software update (and spoof the authentication and certs, etc)… The attacker would need to have access to a pretty massive supercomputer to make their own custom self-driving software and today getting the certs and everything right is next to impossible… but even then its only next to impossible, not impossible.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Attack surface” is the term you want. Big software means big attack surface. So keep code lean for security as well as efficiency.

          • Ocelot@lemmies.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are still a lot of other layers that need to be compromised past the cert for such an attack to even be possible. Even so, I suspect when such an attack does happen it will probably be for stealing cars. Your car would just wake up in the middle of the night and drive itself somewhere else to be cut up for parts. Less likely is any kind of safety issue since its so easy to take over control of the car.

        • 8ender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t even need sabotage. You already share the road with cars that someone repaired under a tree with the cheapest parts they could find.

          • reddithalation@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            oh look more anti right to repair sentiment.

            no, cars repaired by people other than the manufacturer wont kill you

            • 8ender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve been repairing cars for over 15 years. There’s a massive spectrum for quality on almost any aftermarket replacement part. Literally the same part can range from $50 to $400 and the only difference is quality and durability.

              Sometimes the cheap part is fine, sometimes they cause weird problems. Especially electrical parts.

              • reddithalation@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                yeah sure, but that is unlikely to kill you or someone else, and diy repair is almost always good for the consumer

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well hold on there, he survived the crash, and would probably have been ok. It was the upload that killed him.

      • sdf05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, my bad 🤣 I meant the car technically endangered him to not live longer 😔