• Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Admittedly I did not do a lot of digging for the best source and instead just skimmed and saw it summarizing the stuff I’d heard before. The original information comes from a podcast but instead of sourcing the podcast, the article decided to source a reddit thread which was just a transcript of the podcast… Bad journalism and I should’ve found a better source to site here. Either way, the original transcript is shown in the article.

      • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean the original transcript is in the article and it’s a primary source. I just sent a link that poorly sourced the original podcast. It’s not really a lack of proof and more so that the article is poorly displaying the proof we have.

          • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You’re all good :D this turned into a much more heated conversation in general and I also apologize for starting it. I should’ve included the primary source in the original message in the first place either way.

            I’m also sorry this turned out the way it did and I really appreciate and accept your apology. Lemmy is small enough that it’s very possible we’ll be seeing each other’s names in the future (and probably often) and I want you to know that I will be thinking highly of you when I do.