• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If I was the head of either of those organizations, which clearly I’m not, I would leave it. I I don’t want to set a precedent for a global link taxation system I’d have to pay on all of my traffic and all countries. And once it’s demonstrated on news, slippery slope applies, and then applies to More and more linked content until it applies to all links.

    So I think foregoing the Canadian profit would make sense from a business perspective

      • dortydoozer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        "Then, at 1 am on February 26, 2021, news content started to reappear, reversing users’ feeds to how they always looked. But behind the scenes, tech’s relationship with the media had permanently shifted.

        Google and Facebook did not leave; they paid up, striking deals with news organizations to pay for the content they display on their sites for the first time. The code was formally approved on March 2, 2021, writing into law that tech platforms had to negotiate a price to pay news publishers for their content"

        I think you should take note how they made the law after the deals were struck. Canada however has already ascended their version into law, prior to the deals. There is nothing to negotiate in Canada. Abide by the law or get out.