• cloud@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seem like this young activist still has a lot to learn such as ditch centralized social media like twitter and listen more to what activists with more experience who have been fighting for climate for decades have to say

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you really want to be heard a main stream platform is far better than the fediverse. And activism isn’t the kind of thing where years of experience means your position has more merit.

      • cloud@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And activism isn’t the kind of thing where years of experience means your position has more merit.

        You are probably too young to remember activists protesting against oil getting rammed by the government, the same government that is supposed to have a monopoly over nuclear energy

    • 3L54@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Those idiots were not educated enough to support nuclear over coal so she’s definitely on the right path.

      • cloud@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ones supporting coal over anything are probably big ass energy companies your government and billionares have ties with. Climate activists do not advocate for coal

        • 3L54@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They do by opposing nuclear. Good examples in Germany and in my home country Finland. Solar/wind cant replace nuclear by themselves. The old gen activists didnt really have the capacity to think that far with scientific mind nut unfortunately with emotion.

          • cloud@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sounds like you are the one thinking by emotion. Climate activists do not advocate for coal or oil and they don’t run germany or finland.

            • 3L54@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They did run germanys nuclear down. That increases the usage of coal. In finland the activists have opposed nuclear as well which has droven usage of coal up. This is one of the big reasons the green party lost the election so colossally here few months ago. Im driven by science and facts provided by science. Anybody opposing nuclear doesnt know/understand enough about the subject and is droven by emotion.

              • cloud@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The increase of coal did not happen because of activists promoting green energy, it actually happened because your government (the really same that should be in charge for nuclear) doesn’t give a shit and push for coal anyway.

                Anybody opposing nuclear doesn’t know/understand enough about the subject and is droven by emotion.

                Seem the other way around to me, anyone with the slightest awareness and not driven by personal interests can easy understand the issues of nuclear and the advantage of green energy.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxic_waste_dumping_by_the_'Ndrangheta

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_power_accidents_by_country

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaporizhzhia_Nuclear_Power_Plant#Incidents

                • 3L54@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You do realize that your links just prove the nuclear energys safety? There have been few tens of incidents over the years and every single one is documented with care and overall the amount of casualities is miniscule. We’ve had more people dying from hydro by itself.

                  Nuclear is greener energy than many of the other alternatives. It doesnt take much space in the nature and produces miniscule amount of waste that is easily stored and by nature will cease to exist in it’s radiant form over the years.

                  Nuclear is part of green energy movement and the most important piece of it. By this date no other form of green energy is capable of replacing nuclear. Not an opinion but a fact. It just really seems people still opposing nuclear dont understand how it produces energy, how strict the safety measurements are and how little waste it produces.

                  • cloud@lazysoci.al
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There have been few tens of incidents over the years and every single one is documented with care

                    Yes the one from the first link is so much documented that journalists documenting it got murdered

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilaria_Alpi

                    Nuclear being “greener” than coal does not mean that it is green.

                    Having enough iodide pills for everyone and plans for a nuclear disaster do not make nuclear safe.