• PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find that a fundamentally ridiculous point of view, that human life is something so valuable that, paradoxically, no amount of human lives ended could ever justify wishing death on someone, but props for consistency, I guess.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I choose not to dehumanize people.

          That presumes that wishing for someone’s death dehumanizes them.

          If Hitler had been captured, what would killing him have done? I am against the death penalty as well.

          Created an example and a precedent that rulership is not a shield against punishment? Removed a vile human being from existence? Avenged the literal millions of helpless innocents he ordered slaughtered?

          Just wish for a solution to the problem,

          Death is often a viable solution. Oftentimes more viable than the alternatives.

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      All other options having failed, sometimes that means they’re no longer breathing.

      I just love (/s) how tone is policed harder than literal stochastic terrorism from the right.

      • darq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can tolerate killing people, but they draw the line at uncivil words!

        (Unless of course those uncivil words are said towards the people being killed, then they conveniently didn’t hear them.)

    • young_broccoli@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I would wish for his rule to be ended.

      Hard to rule when you are dead. Thats probably the reason why people cheer and not for the death itself.