whataboutist

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Pedantery ahoy, but I’ll take your question at face value.

    There is no such term, as nobody is a whataboutist. Whataboutism is a rhethoric tool.

    While some rhethoric tools are always used intentionally, like jaq-ing and concern trolling. some are frequently (far from always!) used unconsciously because they just feel right:

    Attack on character, sealioning, whataboutism, appeal to authority, argument to moderation, fallacy of the beard, false dilemma, false equivalence, kettle logic, et cetera.

    In my experience, the answer to your question is “usually not”.

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Whataboutery is a much better term than whataboutism. And doesn’t lend itself to mischaracterisation as a personality trait rather than a fallacious style of argument.

        • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Whataboutery is a much better term

          Never heard it, though…

          mischaracterisation as a personality trait rather than a fallacious style of argument.

          Probably both. At least the people I’ve seen using it have done it regularly.

  • MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Some do; others think it’s a valid argument because they see their media sources (or at least people around them) do it.

  • ZenGrammy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Please keep all replies on topic. People should be able to have a discussion about the term without devolving into personal attacks.