• Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    How are Visa and MasterCard IT instead of financials? I realize they use and develop a bunch of tech, but it’s all in support of their space in the financial sector

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought it was weird that Disney wasn’t on there so I looked it up and their market cap is “only” $157B. I thought they’d have been a lot bigger.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For someone who came of age when “Apple” was always prefixed with “beleaguered computer maker”, this is always very weird to see.

  • senoro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Saudi aramco should never be on these lists because it barely counts as a company if it does at all

      • senoro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes it did. But unlike most publicly traded companies only a small proportion of the company is actually available as shares. The Saudi government controls 98.2% of the shares. So the $2.2tn valuation, while accurate, would likely not be as big if everyone else didn’t have to fight over 1.8% of the company. And unlike normal companies, the laws they follow can be changed if the company wants them to be. Buying shares of Saudi Aramco is like investing directly into the Saudi government.

        Compared to the rest of the companies on this list, it is in a hugely different situation.

        • ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s just more similar to a majority privately owned company though, as the Saudi government is just the royal family. That doesn’t mean its not a company.

          • senoro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True, but the saudi government can and do change the laws to allow the company to make more money. It’s more akin to buying shares in Saudi Arabia than it is to buying shares in a company.

            • ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              As opposed to how the US government can and does change the laws to allow the company to make more money?

              Yeah, obviously it sucks to support the Saudi royal family, but honestly, it’s not any worse than buying shares in Raytheon, Northrup Grumman, Shell or BP. All of them are terrible companies doing terrible things to our world.

              • senoro@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But the US government doesn’t do they. Not really. It’s highly illegal to do it for any reason that could be seen to be personal gain. You can’t count on any other country and company to bend the rules so that the company you invest in can benefit. Every other company on this list has to follow the law or face the consequences (those consequences may not be enough but that’s a different problem).

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mislabeled ‘Health Care’ … that sector has very little to do with ‘human health’ or ‘care’