Using exceptions in C++ desktop and server applications overall made sense to me. As I expanded my usage of C++ into other domains, specifically embedded domains, I began to experience more compelling reasons not to use exceptions first-hand…

From lobste.rs

  • lysdexic@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    compiler support

    That remark was on sum types, not monads. You do not need “compiler support” to have Result or neither monads in C++. There are already plenty of libraries that implement those. I use them in some of my projects. No compiler support needed.

    As I said, sum types are not required for Return or Either monads. At best, they are convenient.

    • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The original claim wasn’t that you can’t implement monads in C++, it was that compiler support is needed for “good” sum types. Unless I’m misreading, you brought monads into it. And they’re not totally orthogonal: sum types are a very good way to implement monads.

      • lysdexic@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unless I’m misreading, you brought monads into it.

        You’re misreading it. What do you think a ‘Result’ type is?

        • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, in Rust, it’s a sum-type, with functions that also let you use it like a monad instead of using explicit pattern matching.

          • lysdexic@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, in Rust, it’s a sum-type

            The discussion is on to use monads in C++, and not on why is C++ different than Rust.

            I repeat: you do not need sum types to implement a Result monad in C++.

            • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The discussion was about sum types. The top-level comment, the one to which you originally responded, says:

              It’s a shame that sum type support is still so lacking in C++. Proper Result types (ala Haskell or Rust) are generally much nicer to deal with, especially in embedded contexts.