dyen49k@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agoThey are watchingmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1imageThey are watchingmedia.kbin.socialdyen49k@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square110fedilink
minus-squareeran_morad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoYes, and one CAN integrate by taking paper cuttings and dispense entirely with the idea of infinity.
minus-squaremonotrox@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoI was just trying to make an argument that imaginary numbers were technically not necessary and thus it makes historical sense that they werent seen as something ‘real’. Im not trying to get people to stop using them ;)
minus-squareeran_morad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoEh, this is not worth your time or mine to argue about. Let’s move on. Also, I take your point.
Yes, and one CAN integrate by taking paper cuttings and dispense entirely with the idea of infinity.
I was just trying to make an argument that imaginary numbers were technically not necessary and thus it makes historical sense that they werent seen as something ‘real’. Im not trying to get people to stop using them ;)
Eh, this is not worth your time or mine to argue about. Let’s move on. Also, I take your point.