• awwwyissss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really hope you’re right. VR has a lot more long-term potential than most people realize, and if there’s a corporation in charge of it it’ll be worse

      • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This goes against the whole concept of the metaverse, in metas own words “There won’t be a Meta-run metaverse, just as there isn’t a ‘Microsoft internet’ or ‘Google internet’ today”. By definition, if one corporation is in charge, it’s not the metaverse.

        • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah that’s a lie. Meta wants to be in charge. They’ve just failed to take the market share because the product they made isn’t good

            • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              the project has already failed based on the initial release of their “metaverse” VR game. and whatever future plans they may have I guarantee they will either cancel it or release something completely underwhelming.

                • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  meta is nowhere close to their speculative implementation of the metaverse either, it’s just an attempt to build hype and keep investors interested until they forget about the whole thing in a few years

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t believe for a second that Meta would produce something open and free that they didn’t control and make money from