So, the problem is if you kill a few angry people, they all have at least 2 friends/family members, and therefore you create twice as many angry people as you destroy. The only way killing angry people actually reduces the number of angry people is in fact genocide. But if you’re willing to commit genocide, you have to stop and ask yourself if maybe, you’re the angry person.
Ok, so you unironically want to destroy every single, what, Arab? Including, presumably, children, because they’re all “terrorist”.
Do you realise what an awful piece of shit that makes you?
Please tell me you don’t actually mean this unironically?
So, the problem is if you kill a few angry people, they all have at least 2 friends/family members, and therefore you create twice as many angry people as you destroy. The only way killing angry people actually reduces the number of angry people is in fact genocide. But if you’re willing to commit genocide, you have to stop and ask yourself if maybe, you’re the angry person.
Yeah, it’s almost as if killing people isn’t the best way to achieve anything.
Define civilian death… When all the “civilians” are terrorist well… Not many civilians left…
Ok, so you unironically want to destroy every single, what, Arab? Including, presumably, children, because they’re all “terrorist”.
Do you realise what an awful piece of shit that makes you?