Hello all, I’m taking my first steps in the realm of self-hosting and am learning as I go. I have a VM running ubuntu and I got it connected to tailscale network to fend off unwanted visitors. I also have discovered Docker and am using it to deploy two web applications: FreshRSS and Podfetch. I can deploy them through Docker and they both have their own ports which I can access through ipadrress:portnumber
URL in my webbrowser. But, the connection is unsecured over HTTP. I’d like to take it a step further in order to make the connections go over HTTPS.
I thought to use Caddy to make a reverse proxy as it is supposed to have good support with Tailscale but I’m not being particularly successful. I can connect to the individual applications (FreshRSS, PodFetch) by using the given tailscale DNS name (machine.domain.ts.net) and port directly in the browsers URL, but going to the machine.domain.ts.net does only yield in a connection error.
I’ve attached the stdout from running Caddy, my spidersense is telling it is something to do with getting a cert from letsencrypt. Over at tailscale admin, I’ve ensured I have a tailnet name, MagicDNS and HTTPS certificates enabled.
Here’s some relevant information, Caddy log file is at the end.
Thanks in advance
sudo docker ps
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
86a72dbd2686 samuel19982/podfetch:latest "./podfetch" 20 minutes ago Up 18 minutes 0.0.0.0:8480->8000/tcp, :::8480->8000/tcp podfetch_podfetch_1
a7dae64308f9 caddy:latest "caddy run --config …" 25 hours ago Up 17 seconds 0.0.0.0:80->80/tcp, :::80->80/tcp, 0.0.0.0:443->443/tcp, :::443->443/tcp, 443/udp, 2019/tcp caddy
141bbf69ad62 freshrss/freshrss "./Docker/entrypoint…" 2 months ago Up 2 months 0.0.0.0:8080->80/tcp, :::8080->80/tcp freshrss
Current Caddyfile:
machine.domain.ts.net
respond "hello"
file_server
docker-compose.yml for Caddy
version: "3"
services:
caddy:
image: caddy:latest
container_name: caddy
restart: always
ports:
- "80:80"
- "443:443"
volumes:
- /home/ubuntu/caddy/caddy_data:/data
- /home/ubuntu/caddy/caddy_config:/config
- /home/ubuntu/caddy/Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile
log output from running sudo docker-compose up
in the directory where docker-compose.yml is located
Starting caddy ... done
Attaching to caddy
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0689287,"msg":"using provided configuration","config_file":"/etc/caddy/Caddyfile","config_adapter":"caddyfile"}
caddy | {"level":"warn","ts":1691499456.0720005,"msg":"Caddyfile input is not formatted; run 'caddy fmt --overwrite' to fix inconsistencies","adapter":"
caddyfile","file":"/etc/caddy/Caddyfile","line":9}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0762668,"logger":"admin","msg":"admin endpoint started","address":"localhost:2019","enforce_origin":false,"origi
ns":["//localhost:2019","//[::1]:2019","//127.0.0.1:2019"]}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0775971,"logger":"http.auto_https","msg":"enabling automatic HTTP->HTTPS redirects","server_name":"srv0"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.077673,"logger":"http.auto_https","msg":"server is listening only on the HTTPS port but has no TLS connection po
licies; adding one to enable TLS","server_name":"srv1","https_port":443}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.077703,"logger":"http.auto_https","msg":"enabling automatic HTTP->HTTPS redirects","server_name":"srv1"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.07822,"logger":"http","msg":"enabling HTTP/3 listener","addr":":2016"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0783753,"msg":"failed to sufficiently increase receive buffer size (was: 208 kiB, wanted: 2048 kiB, got: 416 kiB
). See https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/wiki/UDP-Buffer-Sizes for details."}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0794368,"logger":"http.log","msg":"server running","name":"srv0","protocols":["h1","h2","h3"]}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.079528,"logger":"http","msg":"enabling HTTP/3 listener","addr":":443"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.079708,"logger":"http.log","msg":"server running","name":"srv1","protocols":["h1","h2","h3"]}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0798655,"logger":"http.log","msg":"server running","name":"remaining_auto_https_redirects","protocols":["h1","h2
","h3"]}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0800827,"msg":"autosaved config (load with --resume flag)","file":"/config/caddy/autosave.json"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0801237,"msg":"serving initial configuration"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0802798,"logger":"tls.cache.maintenance","msg":"started background certificate maintenance","cache":"0xc00032950
0"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.080402,"logger":"tls","msg":"cleaning storage unit","description":"FileStorage:/data/caddy"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499456.0843327,"logger":"tls","msg":"finished cleaning storage units"}
********************
***** Connection to caddy is made here ********************
caddy | {"level":"warn","ts":1691499478.27926,"logger":"http","msg":"could not get status; will try to get certificate anyway","error":"Get \"http://loc
al-tailscaled.sock/localapi/v0/status\": dial unix /var/run/tailscale/tailscaled.sock: connect: no such file or directory"}
caddy | {"level":"error","ts":1691499478.2793655,"logger":"tls.handshake","msg":"getting certificate from external certificate manager","remote_ip":"100
.125.48.40","remote_port":"60140","sni":"machine.domain.ts.net","cert_manager":0,"error":"Get \"http://local-tailscaled.sock/localapi/v0/cert/vaulty.tail
a5148.ts.net?type=pair\": dial unix /var/run/tailscale/tailscaled.sock: connect: no such file or directory"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499478.2794874,"logger":"tls.on_demand","msg":"obtaining new certificate","remote_ip":"100.125.48.40","remote_port":"60
140","server_name":"machine.domain.ts.net"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499478.2796874,"logger":"tls.obtain","msg":"acquiring lock","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499478.2826056,"logger":"tls.obtain","msg":"lock acquired","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499478.2827125,"logger":"tls.obtain","msg":"obtaining certificate","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499478.285254,"logger":"tls","msg":"waiting on internal rate limiter","identifiers":["machine.domain.ts.net"],"ca":"h
ttps://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory","account":"caddy@zerossl.com"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499478.2852805,"logger":"tls","msg":"done waiting on internal rate limiter","identifiers":["machine.domain.ts.net"],"
ca":"https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory","account":"caddy@zerossl.com"}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499479.3021843,"logger":"tls.acme_client","msg":"trying to solve challenge","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net","cha
llenge_type":"tls-alpn-01","ca":"https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory"}
caddy | {"level":"error","ts":1691499479.867296,"logger":"tls.acme_client","msg":"challenge failed","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net","challenge_ty
pe":"tls-alpn-01","problem":{"type":"urn:ietf:params:acme:error:dns","title":"","detail":"DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up A for machine.domain.ts.net -
check that a DNS record exists for this domain; DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up AAAA for machine.domain.ts.net - check that a DNS record exists for this
domain","instance":"","subproblems":[]}}
caddy | {"level":"error","ts":1691499479.867339,"logger":"tls.acme_client","msg":"validating authorization","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net","prob
lem":{"type":"urn:ietf:params:acme:error:dns","title":"","detail":"DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up A for machine.domain.ts.net - check that a DNS record
exists for this domain; DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up AAAA for machine.domain.ts.net - check that a DNS record exists for this domain","instance":"",
"subproblems":[]},"order":"https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/order/1247308536/200246894916","attempt":1,"max_attempts":3}
caddy | {"level":"info","ts":1691499481.1934462,"logger":"tls.acme_client","msg":"trying to solve challenge","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net","cha
llenge_type":"http-01","ca":"https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory"}
caddy | {"level":"error","ts":1691499481.7219243,"logger":"tls.acme_client","msg":"challenge failed","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net","challenge_t
ype":"http-01","problem":{"type":"urn:ietf:params:acme:error:dns","title":"","detail":"DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up A for machine.domain.ts.net - che
ck that a DNS record exists for this domain; DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up AAAA for machine.domain.ts.net - check that a DNS record exists for this do
main","instance":"","subproblems":[]}}
caddy | {"level":"error","ts":1691499481.7219615,"logger":"tls.acme_client","msg":"validating authorization","identifier":"machine.domain.ts.net","pro
blem":{"type":"urn:ietf:params:acme:error:dns","title":"","detail":"DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up A for machine.domain.ts.net - check that a DNS recor
d exists for this domain; DNS problem: NXDOMAIN looking up AAAA for machine.domain.ts.net - check that a DNS record exists for this domain","instance":""
,"subproblems":[]},"order":"https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/order/1247308536/200246898176","attempt":2,"max_attempts":3}
But, the connection is unsecured over HTTP. I’d like to take it a step further in order to make the connections go over HTTPS.
Why? You’re already VPN’d into a machine you control via tailscale. Protecting the specific application TCP traffic with TLS is kind of redundant at that point. If you really care, just use nginx not Caddy because this will never work using Tailscale DNS, self sign a cert for your Tailscale domain and use nginx to serve traffic on the Tailscale network device.
Also, use docker compose. This will feed DNS records into the containers’ /etc/hosts file as well as put the containers on their own network so the main containers won’t be exposed directly, only caddy.
docker-compose.yml
version: "3.4" services: caddy: container_name: caddy image: ghcr.io/authp/authp:latest # I use authp for OAuth authentication instead of VPN-only access restart: unless-stopped ports: - 443:443 - 443:443/udp - 80:80 volumes: - ${ROOT}/config/caddy/Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile - ${ROOT}/config/caddy/data:/data/ dns: - 1.1.1.1 # set these to your local DNS if you have one, I run pihole - 8.8.8.8 - 8.8.4.4 whoami: container_name: whoami depends_on: - caddy image: containous/whoami restart: unless-stopped
Caddyfile{ http_port 80 https_port 443 } whoami.example.com{ reverse_proxy whoami:80 }
As you can see the Caddyfile directs the Caddy container to reverse proxy
whoami.example.com
tohttp://whoami:80
, which uses the/etc/hosts
entry thatdocker-compose
inserts forwhoami
to thewhoami
container’s Docker IP address. In this scheme, only Caddy needs to have a port listening on the host machine. Assuming Caddy can access your tailscale network, this will work - for that. (although I worry that Tailscale mounts the network device as a unix socket, which may complicate matters - I ran into this when trying some bullshit with nginx/openresty)The issue that you’re having in your logs is that you’re trying to get Caddy to get a TLS cert formachine.domain.ts.net
, which will never work, becausemachine.domain.ts.net
is not a globally recognized DNS record - it’s a split zone DNS for within the Tailscale network exclusively. LetsEncrypt needs to be able to prove you ownmachine.domain.ts.net
in order to issue a cert for it, meaning it needs to be able to resolve the domain and chat with Caddy. Since LetsEncrypt isn’t on your Tailscale network, it cannot do this.Please do, I’d be most grateful for it.
If you have any better suggestion for how I should handle reverse proxying (maybe there’s a easier way than through Caddy?), I’m all ears.
{“level”:“error”,“ts”:1691499478.2793655,“logger”:“tls.handshake”,“msg”:“getting certificate from external certificate manager”,“remote_ip”:"100
.125.48.40",“remote_port”:“60140”,“sni”:“machine.domain.ts.net”,“cert_manager”:0,“error”:"Get "http://local-tailscaled.sock/localapi/v0/cert/vaulty.tail
a5148.ts.net?type=pair": dial unix /var/run/tailscale/tailscaled.sock: connect: no such file or directory"}
This is your main issue - looks like Caddy can’t access the tailscale socket in order to serve their TLS cert. check you’re running caddy>2.5, check the socket exists and check the user running the caddy process has access to it. docs
Are you running Caddy with docker?
Good find.
I am running Caddy through docker (with
sudo docker-compose up
, yml is listed above). I know, sudo:ing docker isn’t best practice, but I’m learning the ropes in a non-production enviorment 🙃 Also, I verified that docker is running as root byps -eo euser,ruser,suser,fuser,f,comm,label |grep caddy
As for the docker version, I verified it by inspecting the image ID and saw that the image version is 2.7.2:
"Labels": { "org.opencontainers.image.description": "a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go", "org.opencontainers.image.documentation": "https://caddyserver.com/docs", "org.opencontainers.image.licenses": "Apache-2.0", "org.opencontainers.image.source": "https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy-docker", "org.opencontainers.image.title": "Caddy", "org.opencontainers.image.url": "https://caddyserver.com", "org.opencontainers.image.vendor": "Light Code Labs", "org.opencontainers.image.version": "v2.7.2" }
It seems that my next step is to look into the issue why dockerized-Caddy can’t communicate with Tailscale. Now I have a direction to investigate further into 🙂
ah, yeah, that’s why. You need to mount the unix socket into Caddy’s container as a volume. Docker uses overlayfs by default to create a layered filesystem, and then launches a distinct user, process, network, etc. namespace for the container’s process, which is why everything is isolated inside the container. You’ll need to make sure the unix socket is available to Caddy’s process inside the container, so you’ll have to mount it using
-v
or thevolume
key in the yaml.sudo
is actually entirely unnecessary with Docker, because most containers will run as the container’s root. Part of containers having their own user and process namespace means their root user is not your root user (technically we can have a debate about semantics for overlayfs and mounted files), and almost all images will ship with the default user as their root. Therefore, almost all processes will be “run as root” from within their container by default, meaningsudo
does nothing except elevate the perms for the user callingdocker
. It would really only get around an issue with your user account not having access todocker
or the docker daemon (also via socket btw). That said, because of the user namespace thing, runningsudo docker run
orsudo docker compose up
doesn’t actually guarantee the process in the container is run as root… just that the container was created as root with perms over the host’s system.The important part is that Caddy inside the container will be run by a user that has permissions over the mounted socket.
I read your comment in more detail, you’re going down the wrong path. What you’re looking for cannot function the way you want the way you want to achieve it, and may not even make sense to want.I am wrong, I didn’t realize Caddy could just serve their cert over the socket. What user is the caddy process on your VM being run as?If you want to use Tailscale DNS, you can use their TLS cert (assuming it gives a valid cert for
machine.domain.ts.net
) and just reverse proxy HTTP traffic with nginx on the VPS/VM (assuming nginx can listen on their network device. I’ve fought with that with openresty before, but that may be because I was trying to host it in another docker container lol).Is there a reason why you’d recommend Ngnix over Caddy, as Caddy also have the capability to act as a reverse proxy?
And if you have any recommendations on resources where I can expand me knowledge on this topic, I’ll be happy to read more.
Thanks again!
nginx just has a lower barrier to entry (imo) if you’re not looking to sign your own certs. Caddy is great for that.
That said, I didn’t know Caddy had a beta feature for serving Tailscale certs automatically. So I incorrectly thought you were barking up the completely wrong tree, which you apparently are not. I’ll look at your tech details more.