Anyone else have a similar experience with one of these drives?

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone didn’t read the story. This is about a known firmware fault that the company is doing its best not to keep quiet. Don’t help them in that work

      • SaiPenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They included a large number of words after the headline that expound on the topic.

        • dartos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but the headline should let me know what the story is and make me interested. Not make me think the author is complaining that their SSD died.

          I don’t care about that. I don’t want to read an article about that.

          • ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            People downvoting you are the same people who complain about clickbait. A good headline should give you a good idea about content of an article. I don’t have time to read 50 articles a day.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is absolutely nothing to say that the author didn’t have it backed up. He still lost 3TB of files from a new drive which was a replacement sent by the company, with a known fault supposedly fixed.

        “Herp derp he should have backed up” is not the takeaway here”

        • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also entirely possible that he was literally in the process of backing it up. He could have loaded the data onto it, then gone to plug it to his computer to back it up when it suddenly failed. The article doesn’t go into enough detail to draw a conclusion on what he did or didn’t do, but the point is clearly that a drive this new and with few write cycles should not be completely failing.

      • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Still, if SSDs fail repeatedly, something’s not right. That’s the point of the article

      • harmonea@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So because backups exist, everyone should be okay with buying bad hardware?

        I know you’re not actually saying that, but countering “this is a known firmware fault” with a reminder that backups should be done sure makes it look like you’re saying that. There’s still value in making sure consumers’ money goes to products that last.

        • PupBiru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          i think it’s the “we just lost 3TB of data” part… either the headline is hyperbole, in which case screw the clickbaint… or they lost 3TB of data which is always a good time to remind people that cheap NAND flash is cheap NAND flash