schalkneethling@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 11 months agoGit Thingsmatklad.github.ioexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down114cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansgit@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up122arrow-down1external-linkGit Thingsmatklad.github.ioschalkneethling@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 11 months agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansgit@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarexoggy@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-210 months ago A better approach is to optimistically merge most changes as soon as not-rocket-science allows it, and then later review the code in situ, in the main branch. I upvoted before reviewing the article in situ, then I had to go back and fix my upvote.
I upvoted before reviewing the article in situ, then I had to go back and fix my upvote.