• self@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    holy fuck the number of people telling on themselves in that thread

    No, he terminally values being attracted to children. He could still assign a strongly negative value to actually having sex with children. Good fantasy, bad reality.

    So the said forces of normatively dimensioned magic transformed the second pedophile’s body into that of a little girl, delivered to the first pedophile along with the equivalent of an explanatory placard. Problem solved.

    please stop disguising your weird fucking sexual roleplay (at best, but let’s be honest, these weird fuckers need to imagine a world in which pedophilia is morally justified) as intellectual debate

    The problem is solved by pairing those who wish to live longer at personal cost to themselves with virtuous pedophiles. The pedophiles get to have consensual intercourse with children capable of giving informed consent, and people willing to get turned into a child and get molested by a pedophile in return for being younger get that.

    this one gets worse the longer you think about it! try it! there’s so much wrong!

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      it’s incredible how thin the pretense is. “I was just casually fantasizing about a scenario in which it would be justified to attack and molest a child” bruh. what

    • -dsr-@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      My friend’s father – coincidentally named Feinman, not Feynman - used to say “They always advertise what they haven’t got.”

      “Less Wrong”.