• Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No they literally state more water was evaporated than heat energy from the light could do by up to 3 times.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s assuming some definition of heat that requires light absorbtion. This is still heat, because all motion of atoms is heat.