Do you keep them in your IDE, or elsewhere? Do you have an app for that? Are they easily shared?
I realized I have no system at all but could use one to make it easier to find code I’ve written and might need again some day.
By snippets, I am referring to any chunk of code / text in any format or language, of any length.
Thanks!
EDIT A DAY LATER: Thanks you all! Reading all these ideas, I got inspired to create my own little web app. Wish me luck… :)
You must log in or register to comment.
Please, can you give an example of such code snippets? I’m wondering what people consider reusable in different projects.
Seriously. A snippet library seems like a significant anti-pattern.
In PHP, a lot. Unit test are boilerplate 90% of the time, getters and setters (although they can be done via Generate), ORM classes with your default shebang (autoincrement ID), and I could go on and on.
I dislike snippets for code like “key this array by some logic” - this should be reusable via a dedicated helper or service.
Getters/setters can also be done automatically by
__get,__setor__callit’s even possible to write a base class or trait that does this automatically.I am a PHP guru, if you’ve ever got questions I’m happy to help.
Sadly that’s against best practices, it does not work with IDE autocomplete, and neither with PHPStan / PHPCS. You also don’t get coverage from PHPUnit. And renaming a property does not rename the usage across the whole project.
__getand__setshould not be heavily used, and the project shouldn’t be based on them.Some libraries, like Eloquent, uses them well, but you still need to annotate your class with
@propertyif you want to stay sane.Please never do any of this
Nah, it’s actually very useful piping and makes code readable and useful.
Not OP, but I’m thinking about the example in vs code: https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/userdefinedsnippets
Some boilerplate code for libraries and frameworks I constantly use.
I’d be more interested in syncing the VS code snippets as they are automatically available in a file for each language and have the autocomplete stops.If a library or framework requires boilerplate code it’s a bad library or a bad framework.
If a library or framework requires boilerplate code it’s a bad library or a bad framework.
I think this take is uneducated and can only come from a place of inexperience. There’s plenty of usecases that naturally lead to boilerplate code, such as initialization/termination, setting up/tearing down, configuration, etc. This is not a code smell, it’s just the natural reflection of having to integrate third-party code into your projects.
Yes, in my experience, boilerplate typically comes into play when you’re using two libraries that don’t know about one another, or have no business touching each other’s concerns. (Using Alpine’s
x-cloakwith Tailwind comes to mind.)That and every single
*-pipelines.yamlCI/CD config I’ve ever written.
Let’s say a function, about 20 lines. Something too small to warrant an external dependency but tricky enough that you don’t want to keep rewriting it.
I have things like a function to read through a file of newline delimited text of key-value pairs separated by whitespace. It skips comments (lines beginning with “#”), and returns the pairs. I’m happy to do a little copying instead of having a little dependency.
It is really really easy to make libraries.
I go full chaos and look up where I last used it when I need a snippet…
It’s got to be here somewhere… (Search for way too long…) Dang, I guess I’ll just write it again from scratch
Yeah, this is what I am looking to avoid.
I have a weird knack for reverse engineering, and reverse engineering stuff I’ve written 7-10 years ago is even easier!
I tend to be able to find w/e snippet I’m looking for fast enough that I can’t be assed to do it right yet 😆
Isn’t that what Gists are for? https://gist.github.com/
I would recommend looking into personal knowledge management. I manage mine in Obsidian and treat snippets like permanent notes
Hmmm, I am using Logseq for that kind of note rn, but don’t really like the way it handles code. I assume that’s a markdown problem, not a Logseq one, but I should look again.
I’m using logseq for snippets too. I find it to be adequate. 3 ticks and the language will get you monospace and syntax highlighting:
cd $HOME ls
My snippets are basically taken care of now by chatgpt.
I mean, I get it. But… damn… can you imagine the relative computing power required to read a text file versus asking a LLM to generate that same text?
Ok.right in the feels.
To be honest, I try to search before on stackoverflow most of the time, due to the ability to write a few keywords and get a suitable answer versus formulate a prompt for the LLM.
But on the other side, llms are used for so much bullshit and invaluable prompts that my questions for helping me in my job has a more worthwile argument.
But of course it is a problematic topic related to llms.
