Firefox users are reporting an ‘artificial’ load time on YouTube videos. YouTube says it’s part of a plan to make people who use adblockers “experience suboptimal viewing, regardless of the browser they are using.”

  • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What’s that federated video service that carries a bunch of YouTube videos?

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Peertube, but it’s not great yet. I’ve not tried to use it for a few years, so maybe it’s gotten better.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Video is hard because it requires a lot of space and bandwidth. We really need a storage and/or compression breakthrough.

      We also need the internet providers to stop being so stingy with network speeds and bandwidth limits.

      Imagine, 100 people trying to load a video from your single hard drive, it’s not fast enough for that. It’s not like a picture where the entire thing can be sent at once. So, it will require a decent tech upgrade across the board before that can be federated successfully.

      A large creator could do something like that and invest money into it, but it will still really be controlled by a small group of people.

      • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        We have had constant advancement in compression. People just keep using it to make higher quality, higher resolution videos rather than actually reducing file sizes.

        • M500@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I agree that compression has advanced steadily. I’m really referring to a break though. Something that gets 1080 videos down to 100mb.

          But more realistically, I think storage is where we need to look. If I can get a 100tb ssd for not too much, then I can more realistically host a video library.

          Bandwidth can be paid for, it’s fast enough. It’s just that the companies charge a ton for faster speeds.

      • sebinspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is one reason I’m excited for AV1. Being able to store high quality video in a fraction of the disk space is something that will bring being a competitor to YouTube much more viable.

        • M500@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was going to play around with it, but it wasn’t part of the standard ffmpeg and I would need special build flags to use it.

          That’s above my understanding, so I didn’t move forward.

          I’ll have to check to see if it can be done at this time.