• Void_Sloth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Bitcoin does present a possible solution to the monetary woes of Argentina.

    Mileis election signals a growing awareness that central bankers are just scammers and getting off the gold standard was one of the biggest mistakes humanity ever made.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ahahah. No. Cryptocurrency is for rubes to get rubed, and tying a State’s sovereign fiat money to a commodity belongs in the dustbin of history.

      • Void_Sloth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        “…tying a State’s sovereign fiat money to a commodity belongs in the dustbin of history.”

        I’ve got to ask, what makes you say this? Especially when scarcity is one of the most critical properties of money, and the governments of the world have shown their willingness to print money infinitely. Which makes modern, unbacked, Fiat currencies virtually worthless in the long run.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The value of a State’s fiat money comes from them requiring that taxes be paid in that same money. Yes they can print as much money as they want, but they don’t, and they can regulate its value by destroying some of it through taxation.
          Second Thought: Why The Government Has Infinite Money

          • Void_Sloth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I watched the video, it’s information I’m well aware of. This video presents theories that ignore critical aspects of our monetary system. For example this analysis fails to consider the cascading effect of interest payments on the accumulated debt. Which are approximately one trillion dollars per year at the time of me posting this.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              If they can print as much money as they like then they obviously they can always make any interest payment, as former Fed. Chair Alan Greenspan himself has plainly stated.

              Furthermore, the government doesn’t need to borrow money in the first place, because again, it can print as much as it wants.
              So you might ask, why does our government create these treasury securities in the first place? I think the answer is largely twofold. Firstly as another tool for managing inflation. By giving the wealthy a safe place to profitably park their money, that money is temporarily removed from the real economy. Secondly because those same wealthy capitalists are the ones calling the shots in the first place, and they want a safe place to profitably park their money.