• yum13241@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because they can’t ship working software. Oh, they also don’t know what “system” means. It shits itself on updates.

    For the love of God, use Garuda instead.

    • helmet91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Manjaro for like 7 years. Throughout these years I maybe had two issues with updates. I’ve easily fixed one by myself (it was a dependency issue), the other one was a bug in packaging. Mentioned it on their forum, they were crazy fast to reply (I wouldn’t even expect that from a software company, let alone an open source project), and the fix was out in a few hours.

      Btw their issue tracking related to updates is top-notch. This is another reason why I had a positive impression with this distro.

      Regarding their own software, I am also impressed by their mhwd scripts. Even a shitty Nvidia driver can be easily installed with it, which actually works. And their OS installation framework has been adopted by other distros as well.

      • yum13241@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used Manjaro and my wifi adapter would shit itself every update.

        I find it hard to recommend a distro that’s so anecdotal. Garuda uses mhwd as well.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, aren’t arch-based distros all have the potential to shit themselves on update due to packaging bleeding edge apps? What’s so different with Manjaro in this regard?

      • yum13241@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Manjaro fucks with the repos, making the AUR poisonous to your system.