• bedrooms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am a pro-masker, but I don’t like this article.

    This is an article from a historian, i.e. not an expert on medicine. What is argued is that we haven’t disproved that mask works.

    The problem is that this doesn’t mean anything. For example, we haven’t disproved UFOs. We haven’t disproved aliens are watching us. We haven’t disproved ivermectin.

    Now, we meet people who insist that UFOs exist, aliens watch us, or ivermectin is the cure for covid, and we are skeptical about them.

    If you read the article, the author only writes that masks aren’t disproved of their efficiency and that it was wrong to say masks don’t work.

    So, a good scientist would understand that there’s only weak evidence for the efficiency of masks raised in this article. The author probably knows that. In that sense, he hasn’t lied.

    However, I suspect he also knew that ordinaries would read this article and jump to the conclusion that masks do work.

      • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No we haven’t.

        We don’t prove negatives in science, or in medicine. We just know that in the studies we have performed, we have not noticed any meaningful effects and we can conclude there is likely no observable benefit to taking the drug for that purpose.

        • Victor Villas@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We don’t prove negatives in science

          That’s simply not true as a general statement lol it very much depends on the negative in question, or what you define as a negative