Striker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前When a stranger ties their dog to your bike.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1704arrow-down136
arrow-up1668arrow-down1imageWhen a stranger ties their dog to your bike.lemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square106linkfedilink
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down38·2 年前I used to tie my ugly mutt up in front of the corner market while I grab a few things. Never to someone’s bike of course. I do not take such a risk with my expensive purebred.
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·2 年前Please tell me you’re being ironic. please
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down23·2 年前I didn’t own both dogs at the same time, but 100% serious. What’s the problem?
minus-squareMaggiWuerze@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前You don’t see an issue in handling a dog poorly, because, as you put it, it’s an “ugly mutt” and then go ahead and tell us how much better you treat an animal because it was more expensive? You really shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog or any animal.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down12·2 年前you are a disgusting person
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down13·2 年前Why? Because I know which dog might get stolen? Should I have denied the mutt walks because of what people might think? Or should I endanger the purebred out of some strange sense of fairness?
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·edit-22 年前Without the additional context it easily sounds like you don’t give a shit what happens to some mutt.
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down9·2 年前Nobody was going to steal a grumpy arthritic mutt. He was a good dog, but not much “curb appeal”.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·2 年前Maybe if you’re a dumbass
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前I assume this is a joke. This is comical villain levels of evil.
minus-squareCalavera@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-22 年前I see this all the time, don’t think it’s such a big deal also, sometimes I don’t understand social network people
I used to tie my ugly mutt up in front of the corner market while I grab a few things. Never to someone’s bike of course.
I do not take such a risk with my expensive purebred.
Please tell me you’re being ironic.
please
I didn’t own both dogs at the same time, but 100% serious. What’s the problem?
You don’t see an issue in handling a dog poorly, because, as you put it, it’s an “ugly mutt” and then go ahead and tell us how much better you treat an animal because it was more expensive?
You really shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog or any animal.
Removed by mod
you are a disgusting person
Why? Because I know which dog might get stolen?
Should I have denied the mutt walks because of what people might think? Or should I endanger the purebred out of some strange sense of fairness?
Without the additional context it easily sounds like you don’t give a shit what happens to some mutt.
Nobody was going to steal a grumpy arthritic mutt.
He was a good dog, but not much “curb appeal”.
Maybe if you’re a dumbass
I assume this is a joke. This is comical villain levels of evil.
I see this all the time, don’t think it’s such a big deal also, sometimes I don’t understand social network people