r/cars mods were 100% bought and paid for by dealers. A whole bunch of them worked at dealers previously or currently. They would lock every anti-dealer thread within hours.

Hoping this community will be moderated to reflect the true values of the community/consumers and not be focused on lining the pockets of the mods.

  • Tangent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mods showing up and doing something in a thread you’re freely saying was about hate? You don’t say! You and I both know those kinds of threads never contain the hate to just that topic, it gets evenly spread around to anyone on the “wrong” side of the argument. If some of them are employees of dealerships you know that you’re talking about posts that directly target them personally right? You’re not discussing hate about some faceless corporate machine; you’re blithely talking about how they, their friends, their family are horrible people. I can see how they might take that a bit more personally. Imaging someone whining about not getting to constantly post about how everyone doing your job is a piece of crap. Even if we take for granted that some of them are dealership employees, do you really think they went to their boss and asked to get paid to kind of sort of defend the industry on Reddit?

    Dealership arguments also inevitably bring in Tesla which is a flame-bait topic and things get heated really quickly. Mods - despite your theories - don’t get paid by anyone to do what they do. They show up to browse just like everyone else and while they’re there they take a few minutes to clean things up. When somebody posts a topic that inspires hate and argument and it starts drawing in hordes of people it turns into a whole lot of work. Work that again, nobody is getting paid for. So yeah, when threads turn into high-volume spewing of “you suck and this is why”, it’s gonna get shut down because screw that. If people want to be children and ignore rules as simple as “be civil”, and “no politics”, it’s gonna get closed. Yes, even if you think people need the valuable public service announcement of “dealerships bad” yet again.

    And how exactly were the mods representing themselves so that you consider them to be “misrepresented”? Nobody there or here is telling anyone about where they work, or what investments they might have so I don’t see how they’re represented in any way at all.

    • mox@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ignoring the mocking and unfamiliarity with colloquialisms.

      You’re literally describing a conflict of interest. Yes, it affects them and therefore they are unfit to moderate a conversation on such a topic because of their bias.

      The fact that you don’t know or understand that, and yet were still a mod is sickening.

      Edit: you need an English lesson to learn that ‘hating on someone’ is very different from ‘hate speech’.

      • Tangent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m really not interested in being told I need English lessons from someone who uses “sowing discourse” when they mean “sowing discord” and who implies that refuting something in a debate is a bad thing when it’s literally the entire point. To be fair I suspect you used the wrong word there again. You might want to look up what a malapropism is and work on avoiding them if you’re going to try and claim the high ground on language…

        I’m not sure how you expect to get unpaid volunteers on an enthusiast forum that don’t have any connection to said industry but in the real world that’s just not going to happen. More importantly you’re still ignoring the main point that insulting any group - especially insisting on doing it repeatedly - is a rules violation, whether a mod is a member of said group or not. I’m not in the slightest bit surprised you’re sickened by a mod who applies rules evenly and doesn’t make exceptions for you. I do appreciate your revulsion though; it tells me I was doing things right more than anything else could.

        I’d suggest you take some time to ponder how the rules here even are a general “be cool / don’t be an ass” and do not make any exclusions for groups you don’t like. If the rules are ever updated to “don’t be an ass except to people who work at a dealership or who don’t hate them” you’ll be good to go! I’m sure you’ll have all sorts of arguments about how you should be allowed to be an ass anyway though. If you’re going to insist on it, try to make it an original thought at least instead of reposting something so commonplace again and again.

        • mox@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Autocorrect sucks doesn’t it? At least I don’t write paragraphs about it. Seriously, you jump to so many conclusions without a shred of proof. Moreover you come across as so holier-than-thou and then tell others to don’t be an ass. MY recommendation is to take a long walk and really consider just how much you care about this.

          Seriously my guy, I wrote a pretty simple ask for transparent moderation and you come out swinging for the fences and super defensive.

          You talk of not excluding and yet admit to openly bias moderating and then continue to shout down others when called out on it, talk about being a hypocrite.