• Draconic NEO@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unless you used Ubuntu 32 bit, then they’ll just drop you like a sack of potatoes, in that regard Canonical is no better than Google

  • WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    we need laws that require companies to unlock boot loaders when they drop support, or at least provide the means to do so.

  • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a pc so old that updates can’t be done anymore as the CPU is almost 30 now and the architecture isn’t supported anymore…

    (its basically my personal Museum)

  • rshalom@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really true. Plenty of Linux distributions dropped 32bit support years ago and 32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years (last ones were some Intel Atoms released around 2010).

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When talking about Linux desktops it includes distros like Debian, who will support i386 until, at least 2028. Even some fast moving distros like OpenSuse Tumbleweed still support i386.

    • Hellfire103@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have Linux running strongly on two laptops from 2007. If I still had my old Dell from 2003, I’d bet I could get the latest Puppy Linux running on it. Maybe even something like Debian or Arch32, if I maxed out the RAM.

    • thejodie@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years”

      I don’t follow. The i386 is almost 40 years old now. Can you elaborate?