India has demolished at least ten homes over the last week belonging to suspected rebels in the region after 26 people were killed in an attack in Pahalgam, Indian-controlled Kashmir, in April.
The ongoing demolitions have sparked anger with locals, who call the punishment an “Israeli tactic”.
On Wednesday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a meeting with the military’s top brass in New Delhi, gave India’s armed forces “complete operational freedom.”
“It was dark when the Indian armed forces cordoned off the village in large numbers and directed us to leave our houses,” Ashiq Ahmad, a villager, told MEE.
“After some time, the earth beneath our feet shook,” Ashiq said, describing the explosion they heard from a mosque some distance away, where locals had been forcibly held for hours.
“When we came out after two hours, we found many houses destroyed and razed to the ground,” he said. “We were mourning the whole night.”
Facts
The person who wrote this article has lead readers on with sloppy language, and trying hard to make things look like something else from elsewhere. It seems to be working on some, judging by your reaction.
They blew up a house with explosives and hit many buildings in the neighbourhood to punish the family of a person who is not home and does not even own the home.
This is basically the definition of terrorism
Have the Indian authorities also confiscated all pics of these damaged houses and allowed the publication (Middle East Eye) to publish only the pics where just one house appears affected, and no evidence of explosives can be seen?
What is the reason damage to houses of these “neighbours” can’t be seen, but just claimed? Marketing?
Yes all baseless lies. Apparently the Indian government is so lawful they got sued for doing this and lost already.
Mr. Juniad is giving a selective picture, which seems to be the theme of your citation, and argumentation.
The demolitions are NOT just on basis of crime allegations. They are demolishing properties which are already illegal under Indian law, and ALSO belong to accused of heinous crimes, like terrorism, in present case.
Supreme court has not banned that.