• TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    You’re obsessed with this singular logical example I provided but you refuse to answer my main question. It’s odd.

    I’m going to ask again: what about someone declaring “down votes don’t affect behavioral outcomes” made you go straight to: “wow. You have so much in common with nazis”.

    I’ve asked this like three or four times, and each reply you write focuses only on the bad logic about the analogy I provided earlier.

    Why won’t you answer my main question? Is it because it makes you seem unhinged? I’m not interested in judging you. I’m just curious why? Why was that the first thing that you thought to write? Why won’t you answer this question? So far you’ve only talked about the analogy I gave and it’s been like three or four replies. I’m really curious.

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Crazy that you didn’t engage with a clearly laid out argument after spending 10 replies arguing that other people aren’t “engaging with your argument”. Also being autistic isn’t an insult.

          You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink.

            • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              NTs don’t need the importance of context explained to them.

              You still haven’t engaged with the argument.

              Seems like you’re all “emotional arguments” and “insults” now that someone ACTUALLY answered your question and you didn’t like the answer. Wonder why no one else wanted to do it.

              • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Apparently…. You’re me? I’m not sure how this is supposed to work. Is there some weird sci-if melding thing that’s supposed to happen?

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                No amount of context warranted calling OP a nazi for simply stating “downvotes don’t effect behavioral outcomes” . Nothing in your asinine insults or wall of text provided any reason whatsoever for calling OP a Nazi for simply making an observation. You can play your psychoanalysis games all day and continute with your insults if that’s what you enjoy

                • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t see where I called him a Nazi. All I said is that he’s contextually aligned with the Nazi position. That’s just circumstantial. Unfortunate for him that he didn’t realise what he was doing, if it wasn’t his intention.

                  But you keep reacting emotionally and finding excuses not to engage with my argument… Weird…

                  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I don’t if you’re Rhoeris alt or not, but this is what they wrote:

                    Imagine being able to justify yourself by finding commonality with Nazis.

                    To the simple statement:

                    Downvotes dont impact behavior

                    That’s it. I don’t know if youre trolling, but if you are, it has to be the saddest thing ive seen all week.