• folkrav@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, are capitalists really added in? They’re baked in the system, from where I stand. How did it ever try to solve generational wealth, when wealth can be accumulated/inherited? When was it ever about wages, and not about profit incentives and private ownership of production? And is “spending your life working” the thing we want to encourage as a society?

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If we change systems then people with wealth and power will erode it or seize the power vacuum created

      Also you are correct in saying you can’t have a Capitalist nation with inheritance

      A more recent example is Communism where every country that claims to adopt it doesn’t do that, instead they tend to adopt more authoritarian measures and centralized governments

      Going back even further you can look at Christianity where people are supposed to be banned from having wealth but they needed to get the elite on board for it to spread

      • Rocket@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A more recent example is Communism where every country that claims to adopt it doesn’t do that

        Huh? There is no country that has ever claimed to have adopted communism. The “Communist countries” are so-named because they are ruled by the Communist Party – similar to calling Canada a “Liberal country” because the Liberals hold power – not because they have actually achieved communism or believe they have achieved communism.

        Those countries often claim that they are working towards post-scarcity (a necessary precondition of communism), but that’s quite different.