• goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It links to a thread explaining that they are being one hundred percent serious, going into detail about the values of critical support.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I found the user, but they made a lot of posts 2 years ago. How can I find the post so I can see the context? You seem to have a link to it?

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can find the post by using the search function and filtering to comments made and what the comment said

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ok so I found the comment, and it links to this post, where they’re joking about giving critical support to Trump.

          It’s not thread going into the virtues of critical support as you said. That pretty significantly deviates from what you suggested, and pretty clearly indicates that this it was a joke.

          Hopefully I’m not auto-banning myself by posting links there.

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              No it doesn’t. In fact it means the opposite.

              Yes the phrase “critical support” means support. But the sarcasm means that the intended meaning is exactly counter to the naive interpretation.

              I feel like I’m mansplaining, but you seem to not understand sarcasm (which is ok, some people don’t; i want to make clear I’m not trying to be condescending)

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yes. Plausibly deniable speech like dog whistles suck. But you have to give some allowances that people you don’t like still have their own sense of humor that you don’t share.

                  I get it, you have an axe to grind. Everyone has one, and that’s ok. I would have appreciated being told that you’re not open to changing your mind earlier on, but I guess I should have just looked at your comment history myself.

                  • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    lmao what do you want me to change my mind on? That jokes about genocide and supporting groups that murder LGBTQ is okay?